Content area
Background
Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) leads to delayed treatments, poor patient outcomes, and increased staff workloads. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools to optimize triage. Objective: This systematic review evaluates AI/ML-driven triage and risk stratification models in EDs, focusing on predictive performance, key predictors, clinical and operational outcomes, and implementation challenges.
MethodsFollowing PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore for studies on AI/ML-driven ED triage published through January 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using PROBAST, with findings synthesized thematically.
ResultsTwenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. ML-based triage models consistently outperformed traditional tools, often achieving AUCs > 0.80 for high acuity outcomes (e.g., hospital admission, ICU transfer). Key predictors included vital signs, age, arrival mode, and disease-specific markers. Incorporating free-text data via natural language processing enhances accuracy and sensitivity. Advanced ML techniques, such as gradient boosting and random forests, generally surpassed simpler models across diverse populations. Reported benefits included reduced ED overcrowding, improved resource allocation, fewer mis-triaged patients, and potential patient outcome improvements.
ConclusionAI/ML-based triage models hold substantial promise in improving ED efficiency and patient outcomes. Prospective, multi-center trials with transparent reporting and seamless electronic health record integration are essential to confirm these benefits.
Implications for Clinical PracticeIntegrating AI and ML into ED triage can enhance assessment accuracy and resource allocation. Early identification of high-risk patients supports better clinical decision-making, including critical care and ICU nurses, by streamlining patient transitions and reducing overcrowding. Explainable AI models foster trust and enable informed decisions under pressure. To realize these benefits, healthcare organizations must invest in robust infrastructure, provide comprehensive training for all clinical staff, and implement ethical, standardized practices that support interdisciplinary collaboration between ED and ICU teams.
Details
Accuracy;
Clinical training;
Mortality;
Risk assessment;
Nurses;
Emergency services;
Multicenter studies;
Health care industry;
Stratification;
Clinical outcomes;
Business metrics;
Overcrowding;
Infrastructure;
Artificial intelligence;
Patients;
Electronic health records;
Delayed;
Resource allocation;
Systematic review;
Clinical medicine;
Clinical decision making;
Intensive care;
Decision making;
Triage;
High risk;
Design;
Interdisciplinary aspects;
Critical care;
Hospitalization;
Clinical assessment;
Forests;
Ethics;
Medical records;
Machine learning;
Data quality;
Benefits;
Data processing;
Health services;
Treatment methods;
Medical decision making;
Natural language processing