Content area
This article examines the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) on higher education, emphasizing its effects in the broader educational contexts. As AI continues to reshape the landscape of teaching and learning, it is imperative for higher education institutions to adapt rapidly to equip graduates for the challenges of a progressively automated global workforce. However, a critical question emerges: will GAI lead to a more inclusive future of learning, or will it deepen existing divides and create a future where educational access and success are increasingly unequal? This study employs both theoretical and empirical approaches to explore the transformative potential of GAI. Drawing upon the literature on AI and education, we establish a framework that categorizes the essential knowledge and skills needed by graduates in the GAI era. This framework includes four key capability sets: AI ethics, AI literacy (focusing on human-replacement technologies), human–AI collaboration (emphasizing human augmentation), and human-distinctive capacities (highlighting unique human intelligence). Our empirical analysis involves scrutinizing GAI policy documents and the core curricula mandated for all graduates across leading Asian universities. Contrary to expectations of a uniform AI-driven educational transformation, our findings expose significant disparities in AI readiness and implementation among these institutions. These disparities, shaped by national and institutional specifics, are likely to exacerbate existing inequalities in educational outcomes, leading to divergent futures for individuals and universities alike in the age of GAI. Thus, this article not only maps the current landscape but also forecasts the widening educational gaps that GAI might engender.
Details
Problem solving;
Higher education;
Education reform;
Pedagogy;
Workforce;
Future;
Generative artificial intelligence;
Access to education;
Knowledge management;
Inequality;
University students;
Empirical analysis;
Automation;
Teaching;
Core curriculum;
Ethical standards;
Colleges & universities;
Emotional intelligence;
Ethics;
Artificial intelligence;
Humans;
Learning;
Transformation;
Landscape;
Higher education institutions;
Curricula;
Educational inequality;
Ability;
Learning environment;
Literacy;
Learning outcomes;
Artificial intelligence literacy
1 School of Governance and Policy Science, https://ror.org/00t33hh48 The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 School of Management, https://ror.org/02jx3x895 University College London (UCL), London, UK