Abstract
Introduction
Notwithstanding their numerous advantages, biological treatments have many limitations when treating patients with psoriasis (PsO) and hepatitis B (HB). Clinicians need to pay careful attention to the issue of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation.
Methods
In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for observational studies on the topic of HBV reactivation among patients with PsO and HB treated with biologics. The random-effects model was used to pool the reactivation rate by the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation method. We selected Fisher’s exact test to compare multiple rates. To determine the sources of heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were performed.
Results
Ten studies with a total of 238 subjects that met the inclusion criteria were included. The pooled reactivation rate was 1.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0–5.6%] in patients with PsO and HB. Among them, the viral reactivation rates of HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients were 4.1% (95% CI 0.0–17.9%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.0–2.8%). The difference between HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients was statistically significant (p = 0.002). The viral reactivation rate of individuals who needed antiviral prophylaxis but did not receive it was 26.6% (95% CI 5.8–53.5%), while it decreased to 0.0% (95% CI 0.0–6.6%) after accepting antiviral treatment. The two-sided Fisher’s test exact values between different durations of biological therapy showed no statistical significance (p = 0.104).
Conclusions
Without antiviral prophylaxis, HBsAg-positive patients with psoriasis are at high risk of virus reactivation when treated with biological agents. Early and sufficient antiviral prophylaxis will effectively reduce the risk of HBV reactivation and serious complications in HBsAg-positive patients. Prolonging the duration of biological treatment will not increase the risk of reactivation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Department of Dermatology, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.414379.c)
2 Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fourth Department of Liver Disease (Difficult and Complicated Liver Diseases and Artificial Liver Center), Beijing, China (GRID:grid.414379.c)
3 Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Outpatient Department, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.414379.c)
4 Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.414379.c)
5 Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Department of Dermatology, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.414379.c); Candidate Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Skin Diseases, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.414379.c)





