Content area

Abstract

Accurate estimation of forest aboveground biomass is essential for the assessment of regional carbon cycle and the climate change in the terrestrial ecosystem. Currently, ensemble learning algorithms and cross-validation methods have been widely applied to estimate regional forest Above Ground Biomass (AGB). However, the effects of ensemble learning algorithms, validation methods, and their interactions on forest AGB estimation were rarely investigated. Based on Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) imagery, Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data and China’s National Forest Continuous Inventory data, this study explored the effects of five ensemble learning algorithms, including Simple Averaging (SA), Weighted Averaging (WA), Stacked Generalization (SG), Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and two validation approaches (i.e. 10-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation) on the AGB estimation of the Natural Secondary Forests (NSFs) in northeast China. The results revealed that the ensemble learning algorithms that combine heterogenous-based models (i.e. SA, WA, SG) generally produced higher accuracy than the base models (i.e. Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)). Among all ensemble learning algorithms, the SG algorithm has the highest accuracy whereas the XGBoost algorithm has the lowest accuracy. Although prediction models considerably impact the accuracy of AGB estimation, the validation approach also plays a non-negligible role in AGB estimation. The leave-one-out cross-validation produced much higher accuracy than the 10-fold cross-validation using the same prediction model and tends to generate over-optimistic AGB estimates compared to 10-fold cross-validation, especially for the averaging and stacking ensemble learning algorithms (i.e. SA, WA, SG). This study highlights the potential challenges of applying a leave-one-out cross-validation approach and provides a scientific foundation for the feasibility of different ensemble learning algorithms and cross-validation approaches for accurate AGB estimation.

Details

1009240
Location
Title
Assessing the effect of ensemble learning algorithms and validation approach on estimating forest aboveground biomass: a case study of natural secondary forest in Northeast China
Author
Jin, Hungil 1 ; Zhao, Yinghui 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Pak, Unil 3 ; Zhen, Zhen 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; So, Kumryong 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China; Faculty of Forest Science, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 
 Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China 
 Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China 
 Faculty of Forest Science, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; College of Forestry Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China 
Publication title
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
609-628
Publication year
2025
Publication date
Apr 2025
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Place of publication
Wuhan
Country of publication
United Kingdom
Publication subject
ISSN
10095020
e-ISSN
19935153
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Case Study, Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Milestone dates
2023-05-09 (Received); 2024-01-23 (Accepted)
ProQuest document ID
3224790444
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/assessing-effect-ensemble-learning-algorithms/docview/3224790444/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2024 Wuhan University. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-07-07
Database
ProQuest One Academic