Content area

Abstract

Background

Knee arthroscopy (KA) is a frequent technique used to treat knee joint problems across the world. Tourniquets are often utilised in KA; however, their safety is still debated. The aim of this study was to determine postoperative pain, recovery time, and postoperative surgery analgesia in patients undergoing KA with and without a tourniquet.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was carried out in the Orthopaedic Department of a district general hospital. A total of 28 patients undergoing KA were included and divided into two groups (14 tourniquet and 14 no-tourniquet). Pain, time for recovery, and use of opioid analgesia were recorded. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was also calculated to review the relevance of the difference in pain scores at different intervals.

Results

There were 23 (82.1%) males and five (17.9%) females from a total of 28. There was no significant difference (p=0.149) in mean ages of the patients in the tourniquet group (28.36±7.52 years) and the non-tourniquet group (29.57±5.61 years). The tourniquet group experienced a mean postoperative pain of 8.00±1.04 on the Visual Analog Scale, while the other group reported 8.21±0.89 (p<0.381). This reduced to 1.14±1.027 in the tourniquet and 0.29±0.469 in the non-tourniquet group (p=0.00) at six weeks' follow-up, thus indicating higher postoperative pain in the tourniquet group. This difference was also above the threshold for MCID, suggesting that it was clinically relevant and meaningful from a patient perspective, too. A greater requirement for postoperative surgery analgesia was also observed in the tourniquet group; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Knee arthroscopy surgery without a tourniquet leads to lower pain and relatively lower analgesic demand postoperatively. Future studies should aim to include a large sample size and long-term functional outcomes for a better understanding of the topic.

Details

1009240
Business indexing term
Title
To Squeeze or Not to Squeeze: A District General Hospital Review of Knee Arthroscopy With and Without Tourniquet
Author
Khan, Zeeshan A 1 ; Abdullah, Muhammad 2 ; Altaf Sadaf 3 ; Wiqqas, Jamil 4 

 Orthopaedics and Trauma, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, GBR 
 General and Colorectal Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, GBR 
 Medicine, Tameside General Hospital, Manchester, GBR 
 Orthopaedics and Trauma, Tameside General Hospital, Manchester, GBR 
Publication title
Cureus; Palo Alto
Volume
17
Issue
5
Number of pages
8
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
Place of publication
Palo Alto
Country of publication
Netherlands
University/institution
U.S. National Institutes of Health/National Library of Medicine
Publication subject
e-ISSN
21688184
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-05-15
Milestone dates
2025-05-15 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
15 May 2025
ProQuest document ID
3225671629
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/squeeze-not-district-general-hospital-review-knee/docview/3225671629/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
Copyright © 2025, Khan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-12-04
Database
ProQuest One Academic