Content area
Susceptibility assessment is a crucial task for mitigating landslide hazards. It includes displacement prediction, stability analysis, and location prediction for individual hillslopes or regional mountainous areas. Physically based models can assess landslide susceptibility with limited datasets by inputting physical parameters, albeit with some uncertainties. In contrast, data-driven models, primarily developed using machine learning and statistical algorithms, often provide acceptable predictive accuracy in assessing landslide susceptibility. They generally serve as practical tools for prediction but lack transparency and scientific interpretability. This review critically analyzes the strengths, limitations, and application scenarios of each model type, with a focus on recent advancements, practical applications, and challenges encountered. Furthermore, potential integration strategies are discussed to address the limitations of each approach, including hybrid models that combine the interpretability of physically based models with the predictive power of data-driven models. Finally, we suggest future research directions to improve landslide susceptibility assessments, such as enhancing model interpretability, incorporating real-time monitoring data, enhancing cross-regional transferability, and leveraging advancements in remote sensing, spatial data analytics, and multi-source data fusion.
Details
Trends;
Susceptibility;
Landslides;
Remote sensing;
Mountainous areas;
Hydrology;
Hazard assessment;
Data integration;
Machine learning;
Mountain regions;
Stability analysis;
Geology;
Data analysis;
Hazard mitigation;
Spatial data;
Landslides & mudslides;
Failure analysis;
Predictions;
Neural networks;
Regions;
Geological hazards;
Earthquakes;
Disasters;
Physical properties;
Algorithms;
Real time;
Multisensor fusion
; Oguchi Takashi 3
; Tang, Yuting 4 ; Pei Xiangjun 5 ; Wu, Yufeng 1 1 Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-0882, Japan; [email protected] (C.Y.); [email protected] (T.O.); [email protected] (Y.T.);
2 School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
3 Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-0882, Japan; [email protected] (C.Y.); [email protected] (T.O.); [email protected] (Y.T.);, Center for Spatial Information Science, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8568, Japan
4 Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-0882, Japan; [email protected] (C.Y.); [email protected] (T.O.); [email protected] (Y.T.);, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, 1-4-1, Nihonbashi, Chuo City, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan
5 School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China, State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China