Abstract
Local governments that rely heavily on central transfers are likely to face a laxity problem when increasing locally generated revenues. The flypaper effect identifies this overdependence by examining the relationship between local expenditures and revenues (central transfers and locally generated). Local governments in Ghana depend on central transfers and locally generated revenues to finance local development. Central transfers are important because they balance fiscal capacities across local governments and promote equalisation in the provision of public goods. The study used panel data estimation to analyse revenue, expenditure, distance, and population from 2009 to 2020 for 17 Ghanaian local governments in the Central Region. The results show the presence of the flypaper effect, a situation explained by the fiscal interest model to reduce the effectiveness and efficiency of local government officials as they tend to be less responsive to the needs of the local people they serve. Furthermore, the presence of flypaper effects reduces local governments’ incentives to increase the mobilisation of local revenue. This paper recommends policies that strengthen local government financial autonomy and, consequently, economic development.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Tingum, Ernest Ngeh 2 ; Asare-Nuamah, Peter 3 ; Yuni, Denis N. 2 ; Baidoo, Nicholas 4 1 University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa (GRID:grid.412801.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0610 3238)
2 University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia (GRID:grid.10598.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 1014 6159)
3 University of Environment and Sustainable Development, Somanya, Ghana (GRID:grid.10598.35) (ISNI:0000 0005 0598 6785); University of Bonn, Center for Development Research, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.10388.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 2240 3300)
4 Queen Mary University of London, London, UK (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133)




