Content area

Abstract

Accurate drought monitoring depends on selecting an appropriate cumulative distribution function (CDF) to model the original data, resulting in the standardized drought indices. In the numerous research studies, while rigorous validation was not made by scrutinizing the model assumptions and uncertainties in identifying theoretical drought CDF models, such oversights lead to biased representations of drought evaluation and characteristics. This research compares the parametric theoretical and empirical CDFs for a comprehensive evaluation of standardized Drought Indices. Additionally, it examines the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of both empirical and theoretical distribution functions in drought assessment. Three drought indices, Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Streamflow Drought Index (SDI), and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), cover meteorological and hydrological droughts. The assessment spans diverse applications, covering different climates and regions: Durham, United Kingdom (SPEI, 1868–2021); Konya, Türkiye (SPI, 1964–2022); and Lüleburgaz, Türkiye (SDI, 1957–2015). The findings reveal that theoretical and empirical CDFs demonstrated notable discrepancies, particularly in long-term hydrological drought assessments, where underestimations reached up to 50%, posing risks of misinformed conclusions that may impact critical drought-related decisions and policymaking. Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for SPI3 between empirical and best-fitted CDF was 0.087, and between empirical and Gamma it was 0.152. For SDI, it ranged between 0.09 and 0.143. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for SPEI was approximately 0.05 for all timescales. Additionally, it concludes that empirical CDFs provide more reliable and conservative drought assessments and are free from the constraints of model assumptions. Both approaches gave approximately the same drought duration with different intensities regarding drought characteristics. Due to the complex process of drought events and different definitions of drought events, each drought event must be studied separately, considering its effects on different sectors.

Details

1009240
Location
Title
New Insights into Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Modeling: A Comparative Analysis of Parametric and Non-Parametric Distributions
Author
Abu Arra Ahmad 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Şişman Eyüp 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Türkiye; [email protected], Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, An-Najah National University, Nablus 44830, Palestine 
 Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Türkiye; [email protected] 
Publication title
Atmosphere; Basel
Volume
16
Issue
7
First page
846
Number of pages
26
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
Publication subject
e-ISSN
20734433
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-07-11
Milestone dates
2025-05-21 (Received); 2025-07-10 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
11 Jul 2025
ProQuest document ID
3233078690
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/new-insights-into-meteorological-hydrological/docview/3233078690/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-07-25
Database
ProQuest One Academic