Content area
Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a transformative technology in dental splint fabrication, offering significant advancements in customization, production speed, material efficiency, and patient comfort. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current literature on the clinical use, benefits, limitations, and future directions of 3D-printed dental splints across various disciplines, including prosthodontics, orthodontics, oral surgery, and restorative dentistry. Key 3D printing technologies such as stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), and material jetting are discussed, along with the properties of contemporary photopolymer resins used in splint fabrication. Evidence indicates that while 3D-printed splints generally meet ISO standards for flexural strength and wear resistance, their mechanical properties are often 15–30% lower than those of heat-cured PMMA in head-to-head tests (flexural strength range 50–100 MPa vs. PMMA 100–130 MPa), and study-to-study variability is high. Some reports even show significantly reduced hardness and fatigue resistance in certain resins, underscoring material-specific heterogeneity. Clinical applications reviewed include occlusal stabilization for bruxism and temporomandibular disorders, surgical wafers for orthognathic procedures, orthodontic retainers, and endodontic guides. While current limitations include material aging, post-processing complexity, and variability in long-term outcomes, ongoing innovations—such as flexible resins, multi-material printing, and AI-driven design—hold promise for broader adoption. The review concludes with evidence-based clinical recommendations and identifies critical research gaps, particularly regarding long-term durability, pediatric applications, and quality control standards. This review supports the growing role of 3D printing as an efficient and versatile tool for delivering high-quality splint therapy in modern dental practice.
Details
Accuracy;
Photopolymers;
Quality control;
Resins;
Standards;
Cytotoxicity;
Polymethylmethacrylate;
Mechanical properties;
Orthodontics;
Splints;
Three dimensional printing;
Fatigue strength;
Heterogeneity;
Temporomandibular joint disorders;
Patient satisfaction;
Dentistry;
Fabrication;
Regulatory approval;
Computer aided design--CAD;
Clinical trials;
3-D printers;
Polymethyl methacrylate;
Dental restorative materials;
Wear resistance;
Dental prosthetics;
Flexural strength;
Pediatrics;
Lithography
; Čimić Samir 2
; Meštrović Senka 1
1 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] (L.Š.); [email protected] (S.M.)
2 Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia