Content area
Honey is prized for its nutritional and healing properties, but its quality can be affected by contamination with toxic elements. This study evaluates the nutritional value and health risks of fifteen honey samples from different agro-climatic regions of Pakistan. Physicochemical properties such as color, pH, electrical conductivity, moisture, ash, and solids content were within acceptable ranges. ICP-OES analysis was used to assess six essential minerals and ten toxic metals. Except for slightly elevated boron levels (up to 0.18 mg/kg), all elements were within safe limits, with potassium reaching up to 1018 mg/kg. Human health risk assessments—including Average Daily Dose of Ingestion, Total Hazard Quotient, and Carcinogenic Risk—indicated no carcinogenic threats for adults or children, despite some elevated metal levels. Antioxidant activity, measured through total phenolic content (TPC) and DPPH radical scavenging assays, showed that darker honeys had stronger antioxidant properties. While the overall quality of honey samples was satisfactory, significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) were observed across different regions. These differences are attributed to diverse agro-climatic conditions and production sources. The findings highlight the need for continued monitoring to ensure honey safety and nutritional quality.
Details
Honey;
Food contamination & poisoning;
Flowers & plants;
Physicochemical properties;
Carcinogens;
Boron;
Metal concentrations;
Nutritive value;
Electrical resistivity;
Antioxidants;
Contamination;
Risk assessment;
Bees;
Ingestion;
Evaluation;
Scavenging;
Quality standards;
Climatic conditions;
Environmental conditions;
Metals;
Heavy metals;
Health risk assessment;
Functional foods & nutraceuticals;
Electrical conductivity;
Natural products;
Phenolic compounds;
Health risks
; Ahmad, Waqar 1 ; Farooq, Anwar 2
; Hammad, Ismail 3
; Mujahid, Farid 4 ; Ayub, Muhammad Adnan 5
; Sumrra Sajjad Hussain 1 ; Emenike Chijioke 6
; Starowicz Małgorzata 7
; Zubair Muhammad 1
1 Department of Chemistry, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan; [email protected] (S.); [email protected] (W.A.); [email protected] (S.H.S.)
2 Institute of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, 40100 Sargodha, Pakistan; [email protected]
3 Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan; [email protected]
4 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan; [email protected]
5 Department of Chemistry, University of Sahiwal, 57000 Sahiwal, Pakistan; [email protected]
6 Department of Plant, Food & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B3H 4R2, Canada; [email protected]
7 Team of Chemistry and Biodynamics of Food, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of PAS, 10-748 Olsztyn, Poland