Content area

Abstract

The sawn timber production process generates up to 63% of residues during primary processing in sawmills. For this industry, the devaluation and disposal of these residues remain significant challenges; proper management requires a more accurate quantification of the volume. This study evaluates and compares two indirect methods for estimating the volume of stacked residues: one based on image processing and the other on terrestrial LiDAR technology. Residues of Pinus spp. from a sawmill were used, with their actual volume determined using a xylometer. The image-based method, which uses threshold-based segmentation, achieved a R2 = 0.64 and RMSE = 0.006 m3. In contrast, the LiDAR-based method, which derives measurements directly from 3D reconstruction, obtained an R2 = 0.506 and RMSE = 0.009 m3. Despite these differences, ANOVA testing (p > 0.05) indicated no statistically significant differences between the methods. The results suggest that both approaches may serve as preliminary tools for forest residue quantification and provide a solid foundation for future research aimed at developing field-applicable technological solutions.

Details

1009240
Location
Title
A Comparative Evaluation of Threshold Segmentation and LiDAR for Sawmill Residue Volume Estimation
Author
Borrego-Núñez, Carlos 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; García-Quezada Juan de Dios 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Vásquez-Ibarra, Leonardo 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; López-Serrano, Pablito Marcelo 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Domínguez-Calleros, Pedro Antonio 5 ; Carrillo-Parra, Artemio 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Compeán-Aguirre, Jorge Luis 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Programa Institucional de Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; [email protected] 
 Laboratorio de Investigación en Biomasa y Energía Renovable (LIBER), Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; [email protected] 
 Department of Computing and Industries, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Av. San Miguel 3605, Talca 3480112, Chile; [email protected], Centro de Innovación en Ingeniería Aplicada (CIIA), Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Av. San Miguel 3605, Talca 3480112, Chile 
 Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; [email protected] (P.M.L.-S.); [email protected] (A.C.-P.) 
 Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Ambientales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; [email protected] 
Publication title
Forests; Basel
Volume
16
Issue
7
First page
1045
Number of pages
18
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
Publication subject
e-ISSN
19994907
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-06-22
Milestone dates
2025-05-08 (Received); 2025-06-20 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
22 Jun 2025
ProQuest document ID
3233203288
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/comparative-evaluation-threshold-segmentation/docview/3233203288/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-08-25
Database
ProQuest One Academic