Abstract
Sustainable social development (SSD)—defined as the integration of equity, environmental responsibility, and civic cohesion—remains an underachieved goal in many multi-faith societies, particularly in Southeast Asia. Although theoretical discussions recognize religion as a moral and institutional force, empirical studies rarely investigate how specific religious constructs influence SSD through civic and policy pathways. This study addresses this gap by examining how collective conscience, rituals and ceremonies, and moral regulation contribute to SSD, and how these effects are mediated by civic engagement and administrative policy. It also investigates whether the function of religion moderates these relationships. Drawing on Durkheim’s theory of religion and society and Putnam’s social capital theory, the study proposes and tests a comprehensive structural model. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire using Likert-scale items from 385 respondents across major religious communities in the Klang Valley, selected via stratified random sampling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to validate the hypothesized relationships. The results reveal that moral regulation (β = 0.336, p < 0.001) and rituals (β = 0.134, p < 0.001) exert strong direct effects on SSD, while administrative policy and civic networks significantly mediate these effects. Notably, the moderating role of religion produced mixed results, including a significant negative interaction between religious function and administrative policy. These findings extend Durkheim’s and Putnam’s theories by demonstrating how religious structures and policy interfaces co-produce sustainability outcomes in pluralistic societies. The study offers theoretical and policy implications for leveraging cultural and civic capital in sustainable development planning.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Awang, Jaffary Bin 2
; Haque, Rasheedul 3
; Qazi, Sayeeduzzafar 4
; Rahman, Nur Farhana Abdul 1
; Senathirajah, Abdul Rahman Bin S. 5
1 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Research Centre for Theology and Philosophy, Bangi, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412113.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 1557)
2 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Research Centre for Theology and Philosophy, Institute of Islam Hadhari, Bangi, Malaysia (GRID:grid.412113.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 1557)
3 MAHSA University, Faculty of Business, Accounting, Finance, Law and Humanity (FOBAFLH), Bandar Saujana Putra, Malaysia (GRID:grid.459705.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0366 8575)
4 University of Business and Technology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.443327.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0417 7612)
5 INTI International University, Faculty of Business and Communications, Nilai, Malaysia (GRID:grid.444479.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1792 5384); Shinawatra University, Faculty of Management, Sam Khok, Thailand (GRID:grid.443708.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0646 5626); Wekerle Business School, Budapest, Hungary (GRID:grid.466256.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0446 163X)




