You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.
If you log in through your library or institution you might have access to this article in multiple languages.
Styles include MLA, APA, Chicago and many more. This feature may be available for free if you log in through your library or institution.
You may have access to it for free by logging in through your library or institution.
You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.
At present, hepatectomy has become the preferred treatment modality for most benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases. Liver failure is a common complication after hepatectomy, and for malignant diseases, how to remove the lesion to the maximum extent and reduce the incidence rate of liver failure after hepatectomy is the key problem at present. Accurate and adequate preoperative evaluation of liver reserve function can provide a basis for judging the progression, therapeutic outcome, and prognosis of liver diseases. There are currently various methods for evaluating liver reserve function and surgical feasibility, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, and there is still a lack of a single comprehensive evaluation method. This article reviews the characteristics of commonly used evaluation methods and related research advances.
