Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire for Victimization and Perpetration (DVQ-VP) in a sample of the Ecuadorian population.
Methods
The study included 819 participants (47% men and 53% women), consisting of Ecuadorian adolescents and university students. An instrumental design was employed for the linguistic adaptation, reliability, and convergent (AVE), discriminant (HTMT), and structural (CFI, TLI, and RMSEA) validation of the DVQ-VP. The construct validity and internal consistency of the instrument were assessed. Construct validity was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while internal consistency was evaluated using ordinal Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients. Additionally, a network analysis was conducted with the DVQ-VP items.
Results
The CFA results indicated that the DVQ-VP has a factorial structure consistent with the original theoretical model, with adequate fit indices (CFI > 990, TLI > 990, and RMSEA < 0.08 in both models of the DVQ-VP). The Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega values for the victimization and perpetration subscales were above .70, indicating good internal consistency. Additionally, the instrument proved to be sensitive in identifying different forms of dating violence.
Conclusion
The findings support that the DVQ-VP demonstrated adequate levels of validity and reliability for assessing dating violence in a sample of Ecuadorian adolescents and university students. These results suggest that, within this specific context and population, the instrument can be a useful tool for identifying patterns of victimization and perpetration in dating relationships. Its application may contribute to early detection and the development of targeted interventions to reduce intimate partner violence among young people.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Burgos-Benavides, Luis 2
; Díez, Javier Herrero 2
; Sinchi-Sinchi, Hugo 3
; Alfaro-Urquiola, Alhena L. 4
; Medina-Maldonado, Venus 5
; Rodríguez-Díaz, Francisco Javier 2
1 Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Department of Clinical Psychology. Grupo de Investigación en Neurociencia Clínica Aplicada (GINCA), Cuenca, Ecuador (GRID:grid.442129.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2290 7621)
2 University of Oviedo, Department of Psychology, Oviedo, Spain (GRID:grid.10863.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2164 6351)
3 Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Department of Psychology, Esmeraldas, Ecuador (GRID:grid.412527.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 1941 7306)
4 Universidad Católica Boliviana “San Pablo”, La Paz, Bolivia (GRID:grid.440533.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 3655)
5 Department of Nursing, Gender-Based Violence Prevention Research Group (E-previo), Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Centro de Investigación para la Salud de América Latina (CISeAL), Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador (GRID:grid.412527.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 1941 7306)





