Content area
Aims: This study explored university students’ adversity quotient and its relationship with students’ achievement motivation and self-regulated learning strategies in the Chinese context. Methods: A total of 319 Chinese university students responded to a questionnaire that measures the adversity quotient (control, ownership, reach, endurance, and transcendence), achievement motivation (motive to success and motive to avoid failure), and self-regulated learning strategies (general strategies for learning and clarification strategies for learning). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were employed to analyze the data. Results: The results indicated that (1) control and ownership directly and positively correlated with self-regulated learning strategies; (2) control and endurance positively correlated with self-regulated learning strategies mediated by their motive to achieve success; (3) reach negatively correlated with students learning strategies through the motive to achieve success; and (4) control, ownership, and endurance negatively correlated with the motive to avoid failure while reach was positively correlated with it. Conclusions: This study shows that developing university students’ adversity quotient is essential. It implies that achievement motivation can be one possible mechanism underlying relationships between the adversity quotient and self-regulated learning strategies.
Details
Literature Reviews;
Student Characteristics;
Achievement Need;
Self Efficacy;
Learning Motivation;
Addition;
Learning Strategies;
Resilience (Psychology);
Learning Processes;
Academic Achievement;
Instructional Materials;
Mathematics Education;
College Students;
Success;
Prosocial Behavior;
Student Motivation;
Mathematics Materials;
Information Processing;
Problem Solving;
Personality Traits;
Cognitive Psychology;
Cognitive Development
; Tang Anqi 3 ; Chen, Chen 4 ; Chen, Junjun 5
; Xiong Yuhan 2
1 Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China; [email protected]
2 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong 999077, China; [email protected]
3 International Affairs Office, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245000, China; [email protected]
4 School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; [email protected]
5 Department of Education Policy and Leadership, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong 999077, China; [email protected]