Supporting First-Generation Undergraduates Through Embedded Writing Tutoring: Emerging Insights from a Pilot Study

Abstract

Writing is essential across disciplines, yet undergraduate programs must balance writing instruction with discipline-specific content. To support writing development, we piloted an embedded writing tutor (WT) in two core public health courses serving primarily first-generation, low-income students of color. In this model, a tutor familiar with course content is integrated into the classroom to supplement traditional writing center support. Our aims were to examine (1) students’ perceptions of the WT compared to the university’s writing center, (2) the WT’s experiences and effective tutoring strategies, and (3) the instructor’s perspective on implementing the program. Using qualitative methods, the WT recorded field observations, the instructor compared course progression to prior semesters without embedded support, and students completed end-of-semester evaluations. Thematic analysis indicated that students valued the tutor’s accessibility, patience, and direct feedback, though perceived usefulness varied by course, likely due to differences in assignment structure. Challenges included role confusion and inconsistent feedback. Suggested improvements included requiring draft submissions, clarifying the tutor’s role, and aligning tutor and instructor feedback. Quantitative ratings of satisfaction were higher for the WT than for the writing center. Although the sample size was moderate (N = 79), these findings suggest embedded tutoring is a promising, equity-focused strategy for discipline-specific writing instruction. In the context of budget constraints in higher education, exploring alternative tutoring and pedagogical support models remains essential, particularly for underserved populations.