Content area

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Although pain education is a very important component of chronic pain management, its effects on primary dysmenorrhea (PD) have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) or biomedical pain education (BPE) combined with exercise training (ET) in PD. Methods: Individuals with PD were randomly assigned to PNE or BPE combined with ET (stretching and relaxation exercises) for two menstrual cycles. The PNE focused on pain neurobiology, central sensitization, and brain pain-modulation mechanisms, while the BPE included anatomical and biomechanical explanations of pain. Assessments were conducted at the start of the study, after the intervention period, and at the one-month follow-up after the intervention. The primary outcome measure was menstrual pain (mean and maximum pain) intensity, while the secondary outcome measures included menstrual stress, central sensitization symptoms, and pain catastrophizing. Results: All the individuals assigned to the PNE+ET (n = 19) and BPE+ET (n = 19; control) groups were included in the analysis. PNE or BPE with ET led to improvements in all outcome measures (p < 0.05). Furthermore, PNE was found to reduce menstrual pain, central sensitization symptoms, and pain catastrophizing more after the intervention and at follow-up compared to BPE (p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.683–1.174). However, menstrual stress decreased at similar levels in both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The combination of PNE or BPE with ET was demonstrated to be an effective approach for the management of menstrual pain and stress in PD. Furthermore, PNE appears to be more efficacious in addressing menstrual pain, symptoms of central sensitization, and pain cognition compared with BPE. Further studies could investigate the combination of PNE with different education parameters and physiotherapy methods to manage PD.

Details

1009240
Title
Pain Neuroscience Education Versus Biomedical Pain Education with Exercise in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Author
Erol, Büşra N 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gürşen Ceren 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Sezcan, Mümüşoğlu 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Özgül Serap 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 PhD Program of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Türkiye, Department of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vocational School of Haymana, Ankara University, Ankara 06860, Türkiye 
 Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Türkiye; [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (S.Ö.) 
 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Türkiye; [email protected] 
Publication title
Healthcare; Basel
Volume
13
Issue
16
First page
1954
Number of pages
18
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
Publication subject
e-ISSN
22279032
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-08-09
Milestone dates
2025-06-03 (Received); 2025-08-08 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
09 Aug 2025
ProQuest document ID
3244038435
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/pain-neuroscience-education-versus-biomedical/docview/3244038435/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-08-27
Database
ProQuest One Academic