Content area
Purpose
The reliability of a new academic software, PET KinetiX, designed for fast parametric 4D-PET imaging computation, is assessed under simulated conditions.
Methods
4D-PET data were simulated using the XCAT digital phantom and realistic time-activity curves (ground truth). Four hundred analytical simulations were reconstructed using CASToR, an open-source software for tomographic reconstruction, replicating the clinical characteristics of two available PET systems with short and long axial fields of view (SAFOV and LAFOV). A total of 2,800 Patlak and 2TCM kinetic parametric maps of 18F-FDG were generated using PET KinetiX. The mean biases and standard deviations of the kinetic parametric maps were computed for each tissue label and compared to the biases of unprocessed SUV data. Additionally, the mean absolute ratio of kinetic-to-SUV contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was estimated for each tissue structure, along with the corresponding standard deviations.
Results
The Ki and vb parametric maps produced by PET KinetiX faithfully reproduced the predefined multi-tissue structures of the XCAT digital phantom for both Patlak and 2TCM models. Image definition was influenced by the 4D-PET input data: a higher number of iterations resulted in sharper rendering and higher standard deviations in PET signal characteristics. Biases relative to the ground truth varied across tissue structures and hardware configurations, similarly to unprocessed SUV data. In most tissue structures, Patlak kinetic-to-SUV CNR ratios exceeded 1 for both SAFOV and LAFOV configurations. The highest kinetic-to-SUV CNR ratio was observed in 2TCM k₃ maps within tumor regions.
Conclusion
PET KinetiX currently generates Ki and vb parametric maps that are qualitatively comparable to unprocessed SUV data, with improved CNR in most cases. The 2TCM k₃ parametric maps for tumor structures exhibited the highest CNR enhancement, warranting further evaluation across different anatomical regions and radiotracer applications.
Details
Computation;
Bias;
Scanners;
Clinical medicine;
Software reliability;
Standard deviation;
Tumors;
Positron emission tomography;
Open source software;
Lungs;
Configurations;
Field of view;
Simulation;
Spleen;
Image reconstruction;
Positron emission;
Biomarkers;
Algorithms;
Precision medicine;
Radioactive tracers
1 CNRS/INRIA ParMA Université Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire de Mathématique d’Orsay, Orsay, France (GRID:grid.463900.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0368 9704)
2 CEA/Inserm/CNRS/Université Paris-Saclay, BioMaps, Orsay, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)
3 CEA/Inserm/CNRS/Université Paris-Saclay, BioMaps, Orsay, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535); Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay AP-HP, DMU SMART IMAGING, Hôpital Bicêtre, Department of Nuclear Medicine - Molecular Imaging, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France (GRID:grid.413784.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7253); Université Paris-Saclay, School of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)