Abstract
Objectives
To examine the utility of the FIB-3 index as a secondary screening tool for liver fibrosis in workplace-based health checkups, by comparing its concordance and negative predictive values (NPVs) with those of the FIB-4 index.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included 12 622 workers from the Hitachi Cohort Study who underwent workplace-based health checkups between April 2021 and March 2022. FIB-4 was calculated using age, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet count, whereas FIB-3 used the same components except age. To evaluate the utility of FIB-3 in excluding liver fibrosis, NPVs were calculated using FIB-4 thresholds (1.30, 2.01, and 2.67) as references. Concordance between FIB-3 and FIB-4 was examined across different age groups. In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with false-positive FIB-3 results.
Results
The FIB-3 index demonstrated high NPVs for excluding liver fibrosis, with values of 99.9% at FIB-4 ≥ 1.30 and 98.2% at FIB-4 ≥ 2.67. Strong concordance between FIB-3 and FIB-4 was observed consistently across different age groups. Among participants with elevated ALT (>30 IU/L), FIB-3 consistently ruled out fibrosis, whereas FIB-4 positivity increased with advancing age. Multivariate analysis indicated that higher AST levels and increased alcohol intake were significantly associated with false-positive FIB-3 results.
Conclusions
The FIB-3 index demonstrated stable performance across age groups while maintaining high concordance and NPV relative to FIB-4. These findings suggest that FIB-3 may serve as a practical screening tool in routine workplace-based health checkups, particularly in mitigating age-related overestimation observed with the FIB-4 index.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Nakazawa, Shoko 1 ; Sakai, Kosuke 1 ; Furuya, Yuko 1 ; Watanabe, Yuya 2 ; Honda, Toru 2 ; Hayashi, Takeshi 3 ; Nakagawa, Toru 2 ; Korenaga, Masaaki 4 ; Tatemichi, Masayuki 1 1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine , Isehara , Japan
2 Hitachi Health Care Center , Hitachi , Japan
3 Occupational Hygiene and Promotion Center, Hitachi Ltd , Tokyo , Japan
4 Hepatitis Information Center, The Research Center for Hepatitis and Immunology, National Institute of Global Health and Medicine, Japan Institute for Health Security , Ichikawa , Japan





