Content area

Abstract

Technical drawing is a foundational university course typically taught in the first semester of most technical and engineering programmes. A thorough understanding of the course content and the ability to prepare high-quality technical documentation require basic knowledge of the technological processes applied in product manufacturing. However, these aspects are usually not part of the standard curriculum. The main goal of this research was to examine how the working methodology used during the project task (PT) affects students’ learning outcomes and social interactions. This study explores three different active learning methods applied during the realisation of the PT, involving one individual group and two teamwork groups, in one of which the students had the opportunity to manufacture a final product based on their technical documentation. In all three groups, student-centred and project-based learning methods were employed. This study uses a combination of two quantitative evaluations: one based on the difference in students’ pre- and post-test results and one supported by a survey performed at the end of the semester to capture the students’ experiences during the project and their satisfaction. The results demonstrate that the learning method that allows students to gain hands-on experience in manufacturing their own products significantly improves learning outcomes. Additionally, it enhances students’ satisfaction by fostering social interactions among them.

Details

1009240
Title
From Paper to Product: Comparing the Effectiveness of Three Working Methods on Learning Outcomes and Social Interaction in a Technical Drawing Course
Author
Publication title
Volume
15
Issue
9
First page
1121
Number of pages
25
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
Publication subject
e-ISSN
22277102
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-08-28
Milestone dates
2025-04-25 (Received); 2025-08-11 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
28 Aug 2025
ProQuest document ID
3254508708
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/paper-product-comparing-effectiveness-three/docview/3254508708/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-09-26
Database
2 databases
  • Coronavirus Research Database
  • ProQuest One Academic