Abstract
Background
Several factors influence maternal morbidity and mortality in northeast Nigeria, and maternal care-seeking behaviour at primary healthcare facilities is a critical factor. This study, rooted in the Social Ecological Model (SEM) of behaviour change, investigated the structural and demand-side cognitive barriers that limit antenatal and family planning care-seeking behaviour among households in Gombe State, Nigeria.
Method
Qualitative in-depth interviews, each lasting 60–70 min, were conducted with 56 respondents, including mothers/expectant mothers (n = 15), their household decision-makers/spouses (n = 16), community leaders (n = 16), and primary healthcare centre (PHC) service providers and volunteers (n = 9). The qualitative instrument was developed and analysed based on four core elements of the SEM: intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, and community-level factors of behaviour. The study was conducted in Dukku, a rural local government area (LGA), and Yamaltu Deba, a peri-urban LGA.
Results
The findings indicate that the direct and indirect costs of care, service quality, and PHC proximity were the main supply-side and institutional-level factors. Most of the demand-side barriers were associated with individual (poor salience), relational (limited spousal support), and community-level (traditional maternal practices) factors of the SEM model. Optimism bias, overconfidence bias, and present bias are some demand-side psychological barriers that impede maternal care uptake. Similarly, supply-side barriers, such as poor quality of care, can significantly undermine individual and community-level demand for PHC-based maternal care.
Conclusion
The SEM model offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex, multi-layered factors influencing care-seeking behaviours toward antenatal care and family planning. The findings show that although relational and community-level barriers are prominent barriers to care-seeking, they are all interlinked and are fuelled by a broad scope of institutional-level barriers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer