It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
File systems serve as the foundation for data storage and access, making their reliability crucial to maintaining system correctness and data integrity. However, building robust file systems remains a significant challenge. Despite numerous testing and verification techniques, file system bugs continue to emerge. To detect file system bugs and improve reliability, we tackle three key aspects: new coverage metrics for testing, a novel model checking approach, and enhanced scalability for file system verification. We begin by introducing input and output coverage (IOCov) as metrics for evaluating and improving file system testing, along with IOCov to compute them. We integrated IOCov into existing file system testing workflows, achieving broader input coverage and improving the detection of crash consistency bugs. Next, we present Metis, a file system model checking framework designed to explore diverse inputs under different file system states. Using a reference file system (RefFS), Metis compares the behaviors of two file systems and reports any discrepancies as potential bugs. Metis leverages Swarm Verification (SV) to scale state exploration by distributing parallel verification tasks (VTs) across multiple cores and machines. Finally, we describe Containerized Swarm Verification (CoSV), in which each VT runs in a container and is managed by an orchestrator. CoSV enhances the scalability of SV by packaging each VT as a self-contained unit, allowing for easy adaptation to dynamic resource availability. In addition, CoSV ensures fault isolation across VTs to prevent faults in one task from interfering with the execution of others.
Our thesis is that effective file system testing requires coverage metrics to guide evaluation, new techniques for thorough checking, and scalable parallelism to explore large state spaces. Overall, input/output coverage helps developers evaluate file system testing, while model checking systematically verifies states, and containerized swarm verification scales this process through efficient, fault-isolated parallelism.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





