Content area

Abstract

There are a multitude of pet diets available for the world’s 476 million pet cats. Among these, an increasing range of sustainable cat foods aims to tackle the environmental, ethical, and other challenges associated with meat-based cat food. This survey of 1380 cat guardians sought to better understand the factors guiding their food purchasing decisions—concerning both current diets, and sustainable alternatives. We found that 51% of cat guardians currently feeding conventional or raw meat-based cat food felt that at least one sustainable alternative was acceptable. Cultivated meat-based cat food was the most popular alternative, followed by nutritionally sound vegan cat food. Guardians reported that the most important feature influencing their willingness to purchase these alternatives was good health outcomes. The dietary choices of the cat guardian were strongly associated with the dietary habits of their cats. Regarding information sources, labels/packaging and veterinarians were most used, with the possible exception of guardians feeding unconventional diets, who appeared to use veterinary advice less often. Since respondents were disproportionately female, from the UK, highly educated, and feeding vegan diets, reported relative frequencies were not fully representative. To minimize any resultant bias effects, we used regression analyses for the calculation of all association estimates.

There is increasing awareness about the adverse environmental and ‘food’ animal welfare impacts associated with the production of meat-based pet food. However, little is known about cat guardians’ acceptance of more sustainable food choices for the global population of approximately 476 million pet cats. By surveying 1380 cat guardians, this study explored feeding patterns used by guardians, determinants of their cat food choices, and their acceptance levels of more sustainable cat food alternatives. The sources of information used by cat guardians to obtain information about the cat diets they chose were also investigated. Key results included: (1) 51% (620/1211) of cat guardians currently feeding meat-based cat food (raw or conventional) considered at least one or more sustainable alternatives to be acceptable, with cultivated meat-based cat food being the most popular alternative, followed by nutritionally sound vegan cat food; (2) the top five characteristics alternative diets needed to offer to be considered viable were good health outcomes, nutritional soundness, palatability, quality, and environmental sustainability; (3) diet types consumed by cat guardians and their cats were strongly associated; and (4) labels/packaging and veterinarians were the information sources most used, although veterinary staff may have been less trusted as reliable sources of dietary advice by guardians feeding unconventional diets. It should be noted that, due to the reliance on convenience sampling and the overrepresentation of respondents from the UK, of female guardians, of respondents with higher education and of vegan guardians, the reported relative frequencies of subgroups were not fully representative of the global cat guardian population. Association estimates were based on regression analyses to minimize any resultant bias effects.

Details

1009240
Title
Consumer Acceptance of Sustainable Cat Diets: A Survey of 1380 Cat Guardians
Author
Mace, Jenny L 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Bauer, Alexander 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Knight, Andrew 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Nicholles Billy 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Centre for Ethics, Philosophy and Public Affairs, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, UK; [email protected], Sustainable Pet Food Foundation, 147 Station Rd, London E4 6AG, UK; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (B.N.), Mace Animal Welfare, Dunnock House, 63 Dunnock Road, Dunfermline, Fife KY11 8QE, UK 
 Sustainable Pet Food Foundation, 147 Station Rd, London E4 6AG, UK; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (B.N.) 
 Sustainable Pet Food Foundation, 147 Station Rd, London E4 6AG, UK; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (B.N.), School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South St., Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia, Animal Welfare Research Group, University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK 
 Sustainable Pet Food Foundation, 147 Station Rd, London E4 6AG, UK; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (B.N.), Bryant Research, 71–75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ, UK 
Publication title
Animals; Basel
Volume
15
Issue
20
First page
2984
Number of pages
36
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
e-ISSN
20762615
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-10-15
Milestone dates
2025-07-23 (Received); 2025-10-03 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
15 Oct 2025
ProQuest document ID
3265823154
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/consumer-acceptance-sustainable-cat-diets-survey/docview/3265823154/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-10-28
Database
2 databases
  • Coronavirus Research Database
  • ProQuest One Academic