Content area
Zibai Jade is a recently identified hydrogrossular-dominant jade originating from Shaanxi Province, China. It constitutes a polymineralic aggregate composed predominantly of hydrogrossular, with minor proportions of vesuvianite, diopside, chlorite, uvarovite, and calcite. A multi-method analytical approach was employed to characterize this jade, incorporating conventional gemological testing, polarizing microscopy, SEM, XRD, BSE, XRF, and EPMA, as well as UV-Vis and infrared (IR). These techniques enabled a detailed examination of its mineralogy, surface features, and color origin. The stone displays a heterogeneous color distribution, featuring a base hue of light green to yellowish-green, accompanied by distinct occurrences of emerald-green spots, dark green spots, mossy green inclusions, white patches, white veinlets, and a black dot with a green ring. Microanalytical results indicate that the emerald-green spots are principally composed of uvarovite; the dark green spots are dominated by hydrogrossular, diopside, and chlorite; fibrous green inclusions consist mainly of chlorite and Cr-bearing grossular; white patches and veinlets are primarily composed of calcite; and the black dot with a green ring predominantly comprises chromite and uvarovite. Coloration is attributed to the combined influence of Fe and Cr3+. The formation of Zibai Jade involved three mineralization stages: deposition of a carbonate protolith, high-temperature metasomatism, and retrograde alteration. The metasomatism was driven by hydrothermal fluids derived from granodioritic and ultramafic rocks, which provided Si, Al, and the essential Cr, respectively. The interplay of these processes resulted in the development of Zibai Jade, which exhibits a dense texture and attractive coloration.
Full text
1. Introduction
Zibai Jade is a mineral aggregate primarily composed of hydrogrossular, with minor amounts of vesuvianite, diopside, uvarovite, calcite, and chlorite, exhibiting a cryptocrystalline [1]. It exhibits a diverse color range, including colorless, green, pink, brown, and yellow hues. The most desirable variety is emerald-like green, closely resembling jadeite. Hydrogrossular jade was first discovered in Tsavo National Park, Kenya; hence it is also known as tsavorite [2]. Subsequent discoveries have been reported in various localities, including South Africa, Myanmar, the United States, New Zealand, and Qinghai Province of China.
Due to its fine texture and diverse coloration, hydrogrossular jade has attracted considerable attention from both researchers and gemological institutions. In 2023, Yalong Zheng from the China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) conducted a series of experimental analyses on pink hydrogrossular jade. The results confirmed that its mineral composition is primarily hydrogrossular and vesuvianite. The coloration of gem materials is often attributed to the presence of transition metal ions acting as chromophores through doping into the crystal lattice, a phenomenon observed in a wide range of minerals [3]. The coloration of pink hydrogrossular jade is mainly attributed to trace amounts of Mn2+ within the hydrogrossular component [4]. In 2021, a study conducted by the Gem and Jewelry Institute of Thailand (GIT) Gem Testing Laboratory—Thailand’s national gemological research center—utilized infrared and Raman spectroscopy to investigate light yellow and tan hydrogrossular jade. The research successfully identified the characteristic spectral features of brownish-yellow varieties of hydrogrossular jade [5]. In 2015, gemological examination and analysis conducted by Lai-Tai-An Gem Laboratory—a professional gemological institution in Taiwan, China—on two green jadeite-imitation bracelets identified them as hydrogrossular jade through conventional gemological testing and spectroscopic methods [6]. In 2014, Yanran Xu from the China University of Geosciences, Beijing, clarified the mineral composition and spectroscopic characteristics of hydrogrossular jade from the Tawmaw mining district in Myanmar through a series of systematic investigations [7]. In 2011, gemological analysis performed at the GIA New York Laboratory utilized infrared and Raman spectroscopy to examine three similar green jade samples. The results confirmed one of them to be hydrogrossular jade [8].
In recent years, hydrogrossular-dominant jade was discovered in Liuba County, Shaanxi Province, China. It is locally named “Zibai Jade” after the renowned Zibai Mountain—dubbed the “foremost mountain” along the ancient Qinba Thousand-Li Plank Road—which is also located within the county. This jade is predominantly characterized by yellow and green tones. Previous studies have documented vesuvianite jade from this region [9]; however, the hydrogrossular variety has not been reported. In this study four specimens collected from the mining area are selected and a series of tests are carried out to clarify the mineralogical characteristics and colouration mechanism of Zibai Jade, while providing a preliminary analysis of its formation mechanism.
2. Materials and Methods
Zibai Jade is primarily sourced from the Shimawan area in Liuba County, Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province. This region is situated on the northwestern margin of the South Qinling Orogenic Belt, near the southern boundary of the Late Neo-Proterozoic to Early Paleozoic Shangdan Suture Zone and the northern edge of the Late Triassic Mianlue Suture Zone [10,11]. The strata exposed in this region predominantly belong to the Silurian and Devonian systems, with lithologies mainly consisting of carbonate rocks, quartz sandstone, and limestone [12]. Magmatic rocks in the area are predominantly composed of Indosinian granodiorite [13]. Regional geological mapping confirms the presence of ultramafic rock bodies (e.g., serpentinized peridotite) within the Silurian strata, providing a crucial source for chromium in the mineralization system [14]. The regional simplified geological map is presented in Figure 1.
The jade is interpreted to occur within the contact zone between the Indosinian granodiorite and carbonate formations, based on regional geological studies and the skarn-type mineral assemblage of the samples themselves [9]. A vesuvianite-dominated jade variety is commonly associated with Zibai Jade in the same locality [9]. Within the studied samples, late-stage calcite manifests as irregular veinlets (Figure 2d), indicating post-formational fluid activity. Four representative samples of Zibai Jade (designated ZB-1 to ZB-4; Figure 2), exhibiting distinct color characteristics, were selected for detailed gemological and mineralogical analysis, with a particular focus on their coloration mechanisms.
After being polished and prepared as thin sections, the samples underwent conventional gemological testing at the National Infrastructure of Mineral, Rock, and Fossil Resources for Science and Technology (NIMRF). The refractive index, specific gravity, ultraviolet fluorescence, and Chelsea filter response were the properties measured [16].
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted using a Rigaku SmartLab (9 kW) X-ray powder diffractometer from Rigaku Corporation, Japan, at the X-ray Laboratory of the China University of Geosciences, Beijing (CUGB), under standard analytical conditions. The instrument was equipped with a conventional copper-target X-ray tube (operating at 40 kV and 200 mA) and a graphite monochromator. The analysis was performed in continuous scanning mode with a step size of 0.02° and a scanning speed of 4°/min. The sample was ground into 300-mesh powder and stored immediately to minimize contamination and oxidation. The experimental data were normalized and subsequently analyzed using MDI Jade 6.5 software. The obtained diffraction patterns were compared with reference patterns from the ICDD database using PDF cards for standard mineral identification.
Surface morphology and backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of the samples were conducted using a Phenom XL (Phenom-World, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) desktop scanning electron microscope at NIMRF. The analyses were performed under an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and at magnifications ranging from 1500× to 27,500×. Backscattered electron (BSE) imaging was performed on polished sections and probe slices prepared from the samples, which were carbon-coated before analysis.
The major element composition of both the matrix and specific surface features of the samples were analyzed using an EPMA-1600 electron probe microanalyzer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) at the Electron Microprobe Laboratory of the China University of Geosciences, Beijing (CUGB). Measurements were carried out under an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, a beam current of 1 × 10−8 A, and a beam diameter of 1 μm. Natural mineral standards were used for calibration, and the detection limits for major elements were below 0.01 wt%.
Ultraviolet–visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy was performed using a GEM-3000 fiber optic spectrometer (Guangzhou Biaoqi Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) at NIMRF. The measurements were carried out with an integration time of 60 ms, 20 averaged scans, a smoothing width of 5 nm, and a spectral range of 400–700 nm.
Elemental distribution mapping of the polished thin sections was performed using a Bruker M4 TORNADO micro-X-ray fluorescence (μ-XRF) spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) at NIMRF. This system is an energy-dispersive (ED) XRF spectrometer equipped with a rhodium (Rh) target X-ray tube and polycapillary optics. The system is fitted with two XFlash® silicon drift detectors (SDD). The analysis was conducted under vacuum conditions to optimize the detection of light elements. Under this setup, the instrument is capable of detecting elements from carbon (C) to uranium (U). Measurements were carried out under an accelerating voltage of 50 kV and a current of 300 μA, with a spot size of 30 μm and a stage speed of 20 ms/s.
Fourier-transform infrared (IR) spectroscopic analysis was conducted using a BRUKER TENSOR II spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, USA) at NIMRF. Measurements were carried out at a temperature of 24 °C and a relative humidity of 22%, over a wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 and 32 accumulated scans.
3. Results
3.1. Conventional Gemological Properties
Zibai Jade exhibits a widespread texture and ranges from translucent to semi-translucent. It has a refractive index of 1.71–1.72 (spot method) and a specific gravity of 3.40–3.54. The samples display a heterogeneous color distribution. In addition to a base coloration of light green and yellowish-green, the surface exhibits characteristic features such as emerald-green spots, dark green spots, fibrous green inclusions, white patches, white veinlets, and a black dot with a green ring (Figure 3). The overall coloration of the samples is predominantly influenced by these surface features. The conventional gemological parameters of the four samples are summarized in Table 1.
3.2. X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRD)
Analyses were performed on the pure white matrix of the white hydrogrossular jade sample ZB-3. The diffraction data of the sample were processed using MDI Jade 6.5 software, and the resulting diffraction pattern was compared with standard reference patterns from the ICDD database using PDF cards for phase identification (Figure 4). The major diffraction peaks of the hydrogrossular jade sample ZB-3 match well with the reference pattern of grossular (PDF#79-1267, Grossular ferroan), while partial peak correspondence is also observed with vesuvianite (PDF#87-1119, Vesuvianite). These results indicate that the pure white matrix of ZB-3 is primarily composed of grossular, with minor amounts of vesuvianite, which is consistent with observations under polarizing microscopy. The sharp diffraction peaks indicate a highly crystalline and fine-grained nature of the sample. The corresponding diffraction data are provided in Table 2.
The powder diffraction data of hydrogrossular jade sample ZB-3 were subjected to angle calibration and least-squares refinement using MDI Jade 6 software to calculate its unit cell parameters. These parameters were then compared with those of standard mineral reference patterns from the PDF database (Table 3). The results indicate that the unit cell parameters of the sample show relatively significant deviations from those of the reference pattern PDF#79-1267 (Grossular ferroan). This discrepancy may be attributed to the presence of a small amount of structural water in the sample, further confirming that the pure white matrix of the hydrogrossular jade is primarily composed of hydrogrossular.
3.3. Microstructural Characteristics
Under polarizing microscopy, the white and light green matrix of the jade was observed to consist of fine-grained hydrogrossular and vesuvianite, with hydrogrossular accounting for approximately 82%, as estimated from image analysis. Hydrogrossular occurs as fine-grained particles with indistinct boundaries, exhibiting complete extinction under cross-polarized light and weak interference colors in some grains. Vesuvianite forms granular crystals of small size, with a few individuals displaying relatively well-formed crystal shapes. Under plane-polarized light, the mineral is colorless and exhibits moderate to high relief with distinct surface roughness. Under cross-polarized light, it displays anisotropic characteristics with first-order gray interference colors. Anomalous interference colors are observed, including yellowish-brown, indigo blue, grayish-green, lilac, and turbid white (Figure 5a). The emerald-green spots are identified as uvarovite. Under cross-polarized light, they exhibit complete extinction, while under plane-polarized light, they display a vivid green color. These minerals occur as granular crystals embedded within the matrix of the jade (Figure 5b). The dark green sports are identified as diopside grains partially replaced by hydrogrossular and chlorite. Under plane-polarized light, they appear colorless with moderate to high relief; under cross-polarized light, they exhibit anisotropic characteristics with second-order blue-green to orange-yellow interference colors. Replacement by hydrogrossular occurs along cleavage planes, with partial alteration to chlorite (Figure 5c). The mossy green inclusions are predominantly composed of chlorite and Cr-bearing grossular. Chlorite occurs as fine-scaly aggregates, appearing colorless to pale green under plane-polarized light with low relief. Under cross-polarized light, it exhibits anisotropic properties with first-order gray to gray-white interference colors. Cr-bearing grossular appears colorless to pale green under plane-polarized light and exhibits complete extinction under cross-polarized light (Figure 5d). The white veinlets and patches are identified as calcite. Under plane-polarized light, it appears colorless and exhibits distinct twinkling relief. Under cross-polarized light, it shows anisotropic properties with high-order white interference colors (Figure 5e,f).
3.4. Backscattered Electron (BSE) Images
Backscattered electron (BSE) imaging provides a clear and intuitive representation of the interrelationships between minerals, particularly through compositional contrast and well-defined phase boundaries. The emerald-green spots are composed of uvarovite, with edges altered by hydrogrossular, suggesting that they originated from the alteration of earlier-formed chromite (Figure 6a). The dark green spots are primarily composed of diopside as a host mineral. During low-temperature alteration, portions of the diopside were transformed into chlorite, releasing elements such as Ca and Si. These elements subsequently reacted with Al-rich fluids, leading to the precipitation of hydrogrossular along the cleavage planes of the diopside (Figure 6b). The mossy green inclusions are primarily composed of chlorite and chromium-bearing grossular, which are distributed within the hydrogrossular-dominated matrix (Figure 6c). Two generations of calcite are recognized: early relict patches derived from the protolith during metasomatism, appearing as white spots, and late-stage veinlets cutting through the matrix, manifested as white veinlets (Figure 6d,e). The black-cores-with-green-rim texture is interpreted as the replacement of chromite by uvarovite, suggesting an alteration process from primary chromite to secondary chromium-rich garnet (Figure 6f).
3.5. EPMA
Previous tests revealed that the green areas of the sample turned red under the Chelsea color filter (CCF). This phenomenon is attributed to the presence of Cr3+, which undergoes six-coordinated isomorphic substitution for Al3+ in octahedral sites, resulting in the green coloration of the material [17]. Based on the electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) results, which indicate relatively high concentrations of chromium and iron in the sample, it is preliminarily suggested that the green coloration is primarily attributed to Cr3+ and Fe [18].
The hydrogrossular and vesuvianite in the matrix contain almost no chromium but differ primarily in iron content: hydrogrossular contains exclusively Fe3+, whereas vesuvianite hosts only Fe2+. The combined effect of these two iron valence states imparts a yellowish-green hue to the matrix of the jade. The emerald-green spots in the jade exhibit a chromium content as high as 10.43 wt%, which is identified as the primary chromogenic element responsible for their distinctive coloration. Fe3+ is also predominantly concentrated in chlorite, which is the primary chromogenic element responsible for the dark green coloration in the jade. A sharp chromium gradient zone was observed in the “black dot with a green ring” texture, with Cr content decreasing from 18.17 wt% to 11.88 wt% as the distance from the chromite core increases. Detailed data are provided in Table 4.
3.6. UV-Vis
For this study, four distinct regions of the jade exhibiting gradational coloration from light to dark were selected and subjected to ultraviolet–visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopic analysis (Figure 7). Two strong and broad absorption bands are observed in the ranges of 400–460 and 570–670 nm, accompanied by a weak absorption peak at 457 nm. These features indicate selective absorption of violet-blue and yellow-orange light, resulting in the green coloration of the sample. The absorption band observed between 400 and 460 nm is attributed to electronic transitions between split energy levels resulting from the division of the 5D spectroscopic term in the 3d6 electron configuration of Fe2+. In an octahedral field, the only allowed electronic transition for Fe2+ is 5T2g → 5Eg [19]. The absorption band at 570–670 nm is primarily attributed to the typical spin-forbidden d-d transition of Cr3+ in octahedral coordination, specifically 4A2g(F) → 4T2g(F), superimposed on the absorption resulting from charge transfer between Fe2+ and Fe3+ [20]. The shoulder peak at 457 nm is attributed to energy level splitting caused by the octahedral distortion of Cr3+ [21,22]. Therefore, the primary chromogenic elements in Zibai Jade are Cr3+ and Fe.
3.7. XRF
To visually observe the distribution of chromogenic elements Cr and Fe in Zibai Jade, polished sections containing emerald-green spots, dark green patches, and fibrous green inclusions were subjected to μ-XRF mapping analysis. Polished sections were prepared from two sample blocks, which were taken from samples ZB-4 and ZB-1, respectively (Figure 8a,d). The scanning results are presented in the figure below (Figure 8b,c,e,f). Combined Cr and Fe elemental distribution maps reveal that the matrix of the jade is nearly devoid of Cr, while Fe is predominantly concentrated in chlorite-rich regions. These observations are consistent with the results obtained from SEM and EPMA. Areas with the highest Cr concentration, indicated by red zones on the map, exhibit distinct point-like distributions that correspond to the emerald-green spots within the jade. Minor Cr enrichment is also observed in chlorite and Cr-bearing grossular, aligning with the distribution of fibrous green inclusions.
3.8. FTIR
The characteristic infrared absorption bands of Zibai Jade are primarily observed in the regions of 3700–3600 cm−1, 1000–800 cm−1, and 700–400 cm−1 (Figure 9). Compared with the reference infrared spectrum of grossular from the RRUFF database, the sample exhibits a νO-H stretching vibration in the range of 3700–3600 cm−1 and a δO-H bending vibration at 1641 cm−1. These observations are attributed to the presence of structural OH groups in the sample [23,24]. Hydrogrossular has the chemical formula Ca3Al2[SiO4]3−x(OH)4x and belongs to the nesosilicate mineral group. According to previous studies, absorption bands above 500 cm−1 may be related to asymmetric stretching and bending vibrations of SiO4 groups, while bands below 500 cm−1 are primarily influenced by trivalent and divalent cations [25]. The absorption peaks at 1097, 862, and 844 cm−1 are assigned to the νas Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching vibration. The peak at 619 cm−1 corresponds to the ν3Cr-O stretching vibration, that at 544 cm−1 is attributed to the ν2O-Cr-O bending vibration, that at 476 cm−1 is assigned to the ν1Fe-O stretching vibration, that at 458 cm−1 is associated with lattice vibrations (related to Al3+ vibrations) [26,27], that at 3670 cm−1 is attributed to the νO-H stretching vibration [28], and that at 1647 cm−1 corresponds to the δO-H bending vibration. The absorption peak at 1422 cm−1 may be caused by chlorite present in the jade [29]. The infrared spectral characteristics and assignments for the Zibai jade (sample ZB-1) are summarized in Table 5.
4. Discussion
4.1. Mineralogical Characteristics and Formation Mechanism
Based on comprehensive analyses including conventional gemological testing, X-ray diffraction (XRD), polarizing microscopy, and backscattered electron (BSE) imaging, Zibai Jade is identified as a jade predominantly composed of hydrogrossular, with minor amounts of vesuvianite, uvarovite, diopside, chlorite, calcite, and chromite. Based on the geological context and analytical results, it can be concluded that Zibai Jade is a typical product of multi-stage hydrothermal metasomatism and retrograde alteration of calc-silicate skarn. Its formation can be divided into three distinct stages, controlled synergistically by protolith composition, hydrothermal activity, and temperature–pressure conditions.
Stage 1: Deposition of Carbonate Protolith
Zibai Jade is located on the northwestern margin of the South Qinling Orogenic Belt. Its protolith is proposed to have been derived from calcium-rich carbonate rocks (dolomite or limestone), which provided the essential material foundation for the formation of the jade.
Stage 2: High-Temperature Metasomatic Stage
This stage represents the main period of jade formation. Silica- and alumina-rich hydrothermal fluids metasomatized the carbonate rocks, leading to the crystallization of grossular and diopside. The diopside occurs as short-prismatic crystals embedded within the grossular-dominated matrix. Critically, chromium-rich hydrothermal fluids, derived from nearby ultramafic rocks (e.g., serpentinized peridotite), were introduced into the system. As the temperature of the hydrothermal fluids decreased, grossular reacted with Mg, Si, and other components to form vesuvianite grains. Chromite was progressively replaced by uvarovite, resulting in the characteristic “black-core-with-green-rim” texture. The white patches in the jade are composed of isolated calcite, representing relict fragments of the carbonate protolith.
Formation of Grossular:
3CaCO3 + Al2O3 + 3SiO2 → Ca3Al2(SiO4)3 + 3CO2 ↑
Crystallization of Diopside:
2CaCO3 + MgCO3 + 4SiO2 → 2CaMgSi2O6 + 3CO2 ↑
Formation of Uvarovite:
(Fe, Mg)Cr2O4 + 3CaO + 3SiO2 → Ca3Cr2(SiO4)3 + (Fe, Mg)O
Formation of Vesuvianite:
5Ca2Al2(SiO4)3(OH)4 + 2SiO2 + 2MgO + 2H2O → 2Ca10Mg2Al4(SiO4)5(Si2O7)2(OH)4
Stage 3: Retrograde Alteration Stage
During this stage, the jade was percolated by late-stage CO2/H2O-rich fluids along fractures, leading to the alteration and reorganization of early-stage minerals. Grossular was hydrated to form hydrogrossular, while completely altered chromite was transformed into uvarovite, producing emerald-green spots. Diopside was altered to chlorite, constituting the dark green patches on the jade surface. The released Ca and Si reacted with Al-rich fluids, precipitating hydrogrossular along fractures in diopside [27]. As temperatures gradually decreased, aqueous fluid activity intensified, promoting the conversion of grossular to hydrogrossular. A minor portion of Cr3+ released from diopside substitutionally replaced Al3+ in the hydrogrossular lattice. CO2-rich fluids dissolved and reprecipitated carbonates, forming secondary calcite veinlets manifested as white veins on the jade surface.
Diopside is altered to chlorite:
5CaMgSi2O6 + 4H2O + 2CO2 → Mg5Al(AlSi3O10)(OH)8 + 5CaCO3 + 7SiO2
Grossular is hydrated to hydrogrossular [30]:
Ca3Al2(SiO4)3 + 2XH2O → Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x + XSiO2
Therefore, the formation of Zibai Jade is best classified as a skarn-type mineralization process. It shares the same genetic environment (the contact zone between granodiorite and carbonate rocks) and similar mineralization stages with the idocrase jade reported from the same locality [31]. The mineral assemblage, dominated by hydrogrossular with typical skarn minerals like vesuvianite and diopside, along with its formation mechanism, unequivocally supports a medium- to high-temperature hydrothermal origin rather than a high-pressure metamorphic origin.
4.2. Colouration Mechanism
Combined data from ultraviolet–visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) indicate that the coloration of Zibai Jade is primarily attributed to absorption transitions related to Fe3+, Fe2+, and Cr3+. IR spectroscopy further detected vibration peaks associated with both iron and chromium elements. UV-Vis spectroscopy directly reflects the absorption characteristics of iron and chromium elements. The yellowish-green hue of the jade is primarily caused by electronic transitions of iron and chromium at 300–380, 400–460, and 570–670 nm, leading to selective light absorption in these ranges. The green coloration of the sample results from the selective absorption of violet-blue and yellow-orange light. Combined EPMA and XRF mapping clearly delineate the distribution of iron and chromium elements. The matrix of the jade is nearly devoid of chromium and primarily exhibits a yellowish-green hue derived from iron in hydrogrossular and vesuvianite. Chromium is predominantly concentrated in uvarovite, forming the emerald-green spots on the jade surface. Iron is mainly hosted in chlorite, contributing to dark green spots and fibrous green inclusions. The characteristic “black-core-with-green-rim” texture results from the replacement of chromite by uvarovite. White patches and veinlets in the jade are attributed to relict carbonate minerals from the high-temperature mineralization stage and late-stage calcite veins formed during low-temperature alteration.
5. Conclusions
Through conventional gemological testing and multiple modern analytical techniques, the mineralogical characteristics, coloration mechanism, and formation process of Zibai Jade were determined, leading to the following conclusions: (1). Zibai Jade exhibits a heterogeneous color distribution, featuring a base of light green and yellowish-green tones along with characteristic surface occurrences such as dark green patches, fibrous green inclusions, white patches, white veinlets, and black-core-with-green-rim textures. The sample has a refractive index of 1.71–1.72 and a specific gravity of 3.40–3.54, shows no reaction to ultraviolet fluorescence, and appears red under the Chelsea filter. (2). The jade is primarily composed of hydrogrossular, which constitutes more than 82% of the matrix. Minor minerals include diopside, vesuvianite, chlorite, uvarovite, calcite, and chromite. (3). The coloration of the jade is primarily governed by the combined effects of iron and chromium elements. The emerald-green spots consist of uvarovite, while the dark green spots are composed of diopside, hydrogrossular, and chlorite, with diopside being partially altered to chlorite. The fibrous green inclusions are predominantly formed by chlorite and Cr-bearing grossular. The white patches and veinlets are composed of carbonate minerals, predominantly calcite. The “black dot with a green ring” texture is mainly constituted by chromite and uvarovite. (4). The formation of the jade involved three mineralization stages: deposition of a carbonate protolith, high-temperature metasomatism, and retrograde alteration. The synergistic interaction of granodiorite-derived Si-Al-rich fluids and ultramafic-derived Cr-rich fluids with the carbonate protolith was key to the development of the mineral assemblage. These processes resulted in the development of Zibai Jade, which exhibits a dense texture and attractive coloration.
Conceptualization, M.H.; methodology, M.H. and L.S.; software, L.S. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, L.S., Z.Z. and L.Y.; investigation, L.S. and Z.Z.; data curation, L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S. and Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.H.; supervision, M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed towards the corresponding author.
We thank Shaanxi Dikan Hanyuan Jade Industry Co., Ltd. (Shaanxi, China) for providing samples for this study. We thank the laboratory of the National Mineral Rock and Fossil Specimens.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1 Simplified geological map (modified from [
Figure 2 Sample photographs. (a) ZB-3: White patches within a white matrix. (b) ZB-2: Fibrous green inclusions embedded in a white matrix. (c) ZB-1: Yellowish-green matrix containing white veinlets, emerald-green spots, and fibrous green inclusions. (d) ZB-4: Light green matrix exhibiting dark green patches, fibrous green inclusions, and white veinlets.
Figure 3 Surface characteristics of the samples. (a) Mossy green inclusions and emerald-green spots. (b) Dark green spots and white veins (c) White clouds and a black dot with a green ring.
Figure 4 X-ray diffraction pattern of hydrogrossular jade (Sample ZB-3).
Figure 5 Polarizing micrographs of the samples. (a) Hydrogrossular occurs in the matrix alongside relatively larger vesuvianite grains (+). (b) Uvarovite exhibiting an emerald-green coloration (−). (c) Diopside grains are replaced by hydrogrossular along the cleavage planes, with partial alteration to chlorite (+). (d) Chlorite and Cr-bearing grossular. (e) Coarse-grained calcite (+). (f) Calcite veinlets (+).
Figure 6 Backscattered electron (BSE) images. (a) Emerald-green spots. (b) Dark green spots. (c) Mossy green inclusions (+). (d) White patches. (e) White veinlets. (f) Black dot with a green ring.
Figure 7 UV-Vis spectra and four regions with varying coloration.
Figure 8 Cr and Fe elemental distribution maps. The representative sample blocks shown in (a,d) were taken from samples ZB-1 and ZB-4, respectively. (b,e) Distribution map of chromium (Cr). The red zones with the highest Cr intensity correspond to the emerald-green uvarovite spots. (c,f) Distribution map of iron (Fe). The Fe is predominantly concentrated in areas rich in chlorite.
Figure 9 Infrared spectrum of Zibai jade.
Gemological parameters of Zibai Jade samples.
| Sample Number | Color | Refractive Index | Specific Gravity | UV Fluorescence (LW/SW) | Chelsea Filter Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZB-1 | Yellowish-green | 1.71 | 3.44 | None | Turns red |
| ZB-2 | White | 1.72 | 3.53 | None | Light red |
| ZB-3 | Light green | 1.72 | 3.54 | None | Light red |
| ZB-4 | Dark green | 1.71 | 3.40 | None | Turns red |
Comparison of X-ray powder diffraction data for hydrogrossular jade sample ZB-3 with standard PDF cards.
| (hkl) | ZB-3 | Phase Identification | PDF#79-1267 | PDF#87-1119 Vesuvianite | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2θ | d (Å) | I% | 2θ | d (Å) | I% | 2θ | d (Å) | I% | ||
| (400) | 30.122 | 2.9644 | 33.8 | Grossular | 30.143 | 2.9623 | 37.7 | |||
| (432) | 32.595 | 2.7449 | 6.5 | Vesuvianite | 32.523 | 2.7508 | 100 | |||
| (420) | 33.78 | 2.6512 | 100 | Grossular | 33.802 | 2.6496 | 100 | |||
| (224) | 34.46 | 2.6004 | 2.7 | Vesuvianite | 34.419 | 2.6035 | 37.3 | |||
| (522) | 34.634 | 2.5878 | 3.1 | Vesuvianite | 34.561 | 2.5931 | 56.1 | |||
| (332) | 35.481 | 2.5279 | 7.3 | Grossular | 35.505 | 2.5263 | 6.3 | |||
| (620) | 36.643 | 2.4504 | 2.5 | Vesuvianite | 36.543 | 2.4569 | 40.8 | |||
| (422) | 37.118 | 2.4201 | 16.7 | Grossular | 37.14 | 2.4187 | 20.2 | |||
| (431) | 38.697 | 2.3250 | 16.6 | Grossular | 38.716 | 2.3238 | 13.2 | |||
| (521) | 41.697 | 2.1643 | 14.2 | Grossular | 41.716 | 2.1634 | 12.1 | |||
| (440) | 43.135 | 2.0955 | 3.6 | Grossular | 43.152 | 2.0947 | 2.6 | |||
| (611) | 47.222 | 1.9232 | 24 | Grossular | 47.247 | 1.9222 | 19.1 | |||
| (620) | 48.535 | 1.8742 | 1.6 | Grossular | 48.552 | 1.8735 | 1.4 | |||
| (444) | 53.516 | 1.7109 | 17.2 | Grossular | 53.536 | 1.7103 | 12.9 | |||
| (640) | 55.881 | 1.6439 | 23.2 | Grossular | 55.909 | 1.6432 | 22.5 | |||
| (642) | 58.197 | 1.5839 | 39.6 | Grossular | 58.217 | 1.5834 | 36.1 | |||
| (800) | 62.641 | 1.4818 | 8.7 | Grossular | 62.671 | 1.4812 | 8.2 | |||
Comparison of Unit Cell Parameters Between Hydrogrossular Jade Sample ZB-3 and Reference PDF Cards.
| Sample | Crystal System | Axis a (Å) | Unit Cell Volume (Å3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZB-3 | Cubic | 11.493(5) | 1518.099 |
| PDF#79-1267 Grossular ferroan | Cubic | 11.849 | 1663.585 |
Note: Based on the quality of the least-squares refinement, the estimated standard deviation is on the order of ±0.005 Å.
Chemical composition of constituent minerals in the jade.
| Sample | Matrix | Emerald-Green Spots | Dark Green Spot s | ||||
| Date | ZBJ-1 (Hgrs) | ZBJ-2 (Ves) | ZBC-1 (Ugr) | ZBS-1 (Di) | ZBS-2 (Chl) | ZBS-3 (Hgrs) | |
| SiO2 | 37.54 | 35.26 | 35.18 | 53.54 | 23.06 | 35.27 | |
| Na2O | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
| TiO2 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
| MgO | 0.14 | 3.26 | 0.05 | 19.10 | 30.90 | 0.06 | |
| K2O | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Al2O3 | 24.13 | 17.76 | 12.69 | 0.34 | 30.51 | 21.71 | |
| CaO | 36.41 | 38.13 | 35.98 | 25.34 | 0.03 | 38.75 | |
| Cr2O3 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 10.43 | 0.08 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| MnO | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.00 | |
| Fe2O3 | 0.38 | — | 3.27 | 0.59 | 3.31 | 0.44 | |
| FeO | — | 1.62 | — | — | — | — | |
| NiO | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.00 | |
| CoO | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
| Total | 98.73 | 96.25 | 97.94 | 99.08 | 88.32 | 96.29 | |
| Sample | Mossy Green Inclusions | Black Dot with a Green Ring | |||||
| Date | ZBX-1 (Chl) | ZBX-2 (Cr-Grs) | ZBH-1 (Chr) | ZBH-2 (Ugr) | ZBH-3 (Ugr) | ZBH-4 (Ugr) | |
| SiO2 | 26.01 | 35.80 | 0.44 | 34.17 | 33.92 | 34.18 | |
| Na2O | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | |
| TiO2 | 0.01 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.56 | |
| MgO | 31.44 | 0.44 | 2.41 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.13 | |
| K2O | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03 | |
| Al2O3 | 22.72 | 18.38 | 10.55 | 6.71 | 8.55 | 10.63 | |
| CaO | 3.77 | 35.14 | 1.31 | 35.13 | 35.12 | 35.03 | |
| Cr2O3 | 0.08 | 1.41 | 44.36 | 18.17 | 15.99 | 11.88 | |
| MnO | 0.07 | 0.38 | 1.35 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.17 | |
| Fe2O3 | 1.95 | 3.01 | 13.09 | 1.86 | 2.85 | 3.65 | |
| FeO | — | — | 26.21 | — | — | — | |
| NiO | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| CoO | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | |
| Total | 86.47 | 95.25 | 100.54 | 96.52 | 97.03 | 96.32 | |
Infrared spectral characteristics and assignments of hydrogrossular Jade (ZB-1).
| Sample | ZB-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vibrational Mode Assignments | ||
| νas Si-O-Si Asymmetric Stretching Vibration | 1,097,862,844 cm−1 | |
| v3 Cr-OStretching Vibration | 619 cm−1 | |
| v2O-Cr-OBending Vibration | 544 cm−1 | |
| v1Fe-OStretching Vibration | 476 cm−1 | |
| Lattice Vibrations (Associated with Al3+ Vibrations) | 458 cm−1 | |
| ΝO-H Stretching Vibration | 3670 cm−1 | |
| δ O-H Bending Vibration | 1647 cm−1 | |
1. Zhao, D.T. Analysis of Natural Jade Resources in Qinghai Province. J. Qinghai Univ.; 2012; 30, pp. 66-68+75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13901/j.cnki.qhwxxbzk.2012.04.014]
2. Li, Z.C. Garnet. Zhu Bao; 1991; 2, pp. 16-19+1.
3. Bloise, A.; Barrese, E.; Apollaro, C.; Miriello, D. Flux growth and characterization of Ti-and Ni-doped forsterite single crystals. Crystal Research and Technology. J. Exp. Ind. Crystallogr.; 2009; 44, pp. 463-468.
4. Zheng, Y.L.; Chen, M.H.; Sun, R.Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, C. Gemological and Mineralogical Characteristics of Pink Hydrogrossular. J. Gems Gemmol.; 2023; 25, pp. 14-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2023.01.002]
5. Hsu, T.; Kennedy, L.; Choudhary, G. Synthetics and Simulants. Gems Gemol.; 2024; 60, pp. 260-265.
6. Chilstrom, C. Large Star Emerald. Gems Gemol.; 2015; 51, pp. 334-335.
7. Xu, Y.R. Study on Gemological and Mineralogical Characteristics of Hydrogrossular Jade and Vesuvianite Jade from the Tawmaw Area, Myanmar. Master’s Thesis; China University of Geosciences (Beijing): Beijing, China, 2014.
8. Lu, R. Three Similar-Appearing Green Stones: Jadeite, Omphacite, and Hydrogrossular. Gems Gemol.; 2011; 47, pp. 52-53.
9. Liu, H.; Ruan, Q.F.; Qiu, Z.H.; Lei, T.; Zhu, M. Mineralogical Characteristics and Color Genesis of Vesuvianite Jade from Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province. Miner. Petrol.; 2023; 43, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.19719/j.cnki.1001-6872.2023.03.01]
10. Zhang, Y.J.; Liang, W.T.; Luo, X.R.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, G. Geochemical Characteristics and Petrogenetic Significance of Biotite from Guangtoushan Rock Masses, Qinling Orogenic Belt. Miner. Petrol.; 2015; 35, pp. 100-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.19719/j.cnki.1001-6872.2015.01.013]
11. Song, X.W.; Hou, M.T.; Chen, R.Y. Division of Metallogenic Provinces (Belts) in Shaanxi Province. Northwest. Geol.; 2004; 3, pp. 29-42.
12. Wang, F.; Li, J.Y.; Fu, C.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Chen, Y. Geological Characteristics and Gold Prospecting Potential of the Pogenjiao Silver-Lead Deposit in Taibai County, Shaanxi Province. Acta Geol. Sichuan; 2017; 37, pp. 396-399+420.
13. Wang, Z.M.; Xiao, H.L.; Wang, D.S.; Xie, H.P. Geological Characteristics and Metallogenic Conditions of the Xigou Copper Deposit in Liuba County, Shaanxi Province. Shaanxi Geol.; 2018; 3, pp. 15-18.
14. Liu, H. Gemological and Mineralogical Characteristics and Genetic Study of Hanzhong Vesuvianite Jade from Shaanxi Province. Master’s Thesis; Guilin University of Technology: Guilin, China, 2022.
15. Bai, W.L.; Yang, Z.L.; Liu, Z.H.; Xie, F. Application of Gully-Soil Geochemical Survey in Gold Exploration of Liuba County, Shaanxi Province. Miner. Resour. Geol.; 2017; 31, pp. 780-784.
16. Fang, Z.; Wang, X.M. Mineralogical Study of the Jade “Budaweng” Resembling Jadeite. Geol. Chem. Miner.; 2002; 1, pp. 7-10+27.
17. Liang, T.; Liu, Y.X. Comparative Study of Color Characteristics of Yunnan Emerald and Colombian Emerald. J. Xi’an Eng. Univ.; 1998; 3, pp. 43-47.
18. Tian, H.S.; Zhao, Y.J. Discovery and Preliminary Study of Chromium-rich Vesuvianite from Yaoshan, Jinan. Shandong Geol.; 1992; 2, pp. 115-118.
19. Wu, H.Q. Study on Gemological Characteristics and Color Genesis of Orange-Red Series Garnet. Master’s Thesis; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2016.
20. Li, M.Y. Gemological Characteristics and Color Genesis of Philippine “Dushan Jade”. Master’s Thesis; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2019; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.27493/d.cnki.gzdzy.2019.000617]
21. Liu, J.; Yang, M.X.; Di, J.R.; He, C. Spectroscopic Study of Uvarovite in Anorthite Jade. Spectrosc. Spect. Anal.; 2018; 38, pp. 1758-1762.
22. Qu, M.W.; Zhong, Y.; Shen, X.T. Gemological Characteristics of Zambian Purplish-Red to Brownish-Red Garnets. J. Gems Gemmol.; 2021; 23, pp. 20-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15964/j.cnki.027jgg.2021.04.003]
23. Schoenitz, M.; Navrotsky, A. Enthalpy of Formation of Katoite Ca3Al2[(OH)4]3: Energetics of the Hydrogarnet Substitution. Am. Mineral.; 1999; 84, pp. 389-395. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am-1999-0323]
24. Geiger, C.A.; Dachs, E.; Benisek, A. Thermodynamic Behavior and Properties of Katoite (Hydrogrossular): A Calorimetric Study. Am. Mineral.; 2012; 97, pp. 1252-1255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.4106]
25. Panikorovskii, T.L.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Galuskin, E.V.; Shilovskikh, V.V.; Mazur, A.S.; Bazai, A.V. Si-Deficient, OH-Substituted, Boron-Bearing Vesuvianite from Sakha-Yakutia, Russia: A Combined Single-Crystal, 1H MAS-NMR and IR Spectroscopic Study. Eur. J. Miner.; 2016; 28, pp. 931-941. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2016/0028-2570]
26. Liu, X. Study on Gemological and Mineralogical Characteristics of Henan Dushan Jade. Master’s Thesis; Hebei GEO University: Shijiazhuang, China, 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.27752/d.cnki.gsjzj.2022.000839]
27. Yong, C.Y. Study on Gemological and Mineralogical Characteristics of Mexican Strawberry-Red Grossular Garnet. Master’s Thesis; China University of Geosciences: Beijing, China, 2019; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.27493/d.cnki.gzdzy.2019.000610]
28. Lu, H.H.; Pan, L.; Han, S.H.; Hao, F. Study on the Infrared Spectroscopy of Methyl and Chloromethyl Substituted Silatranes. Elastomer; 1998; 2, pp. 24-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16665/j.cnki.issn1005-3174.1998.02.005]
29. Ren, H.; Zheng, Y.Y.; Wu, S. Application of Short-Wave Infrared Spectroscopy of Chlorite in Exploration of the Demingding Mo-Cu Deposit, Tibet. Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on Metallogenic Theory and Prospecting Methods; Wuhan, China, 13–15 December 2019; 444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2019.025456]
30. Jia, R.X. Geological and Geochemical Study of the Gejiu Tin Ore Concentration Area in Yunnan Province. Ph.D. Thesis; Northwest University: Xi’an, China, 2005.
31. Shi, R.D.; Yang, J.S.; Wang, X.B.; Zheng, X.H. Discovery and Significance of Rodingite in the Derni Copper Mining Area. Proceedings of the 4th National Conference of Young Geologists; Beijing, China, 15–18 October 1999; pp. 113-120.
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.