Content area
This study examines GPT usage in university-level programming education, focusing on patterns and correlations in students’ learning behaviors. A survey of 438 students from four universities was conducted to analyze their adoption of AI, learning dispositions, and behavioral patterns. The research aimed to understand the current state of GPT adoption and the connection between student learning approaches and their use of these technologies. Findings show that while a majority of students use GPT applications, the frequency and depth of this engagement vary significantly. Students who favor self-directed learning tend to leverage this technology more for personalized learning and self-assessment. Conversely, students more accustomed to traditional teaching methods use it more conservatively. The study identified four distinct learner groups through cluster analysis, each with unique interaction styles. Furthermore, a correlation analysis indicated that learning orientations, such as Technology-Driven Learning and intrinsic motivation, are positively associated with more frequent and effective GPT use.
Details
Critical Thinking;
Experiential Learning;
Active Learning;
Educational Methods;
Educational Technology;
Behavior Patterns;
Cooperative Learning;
Educational Theories;
Educational Psychology;
Blended Learning;
Communities of Practice;
Student Needs;
Collaborative Writing;
Educational Objectives;
Artificial Intelligence;
Evaluative Thinking;
Engineering Education;
Educational Environment;
Cognitive Structures;
Learner Engagement;
Educational Trends;
Constructivism (Learning);
Higher Education;
Educational Strategies
Students;
Teaching methods;
Constructivism;
Science;
Cognitive style;
Gender;
Interdisciplinary aspects;
Educational technology;
Feedback;
Behavioral psychology;
Cognition & reasoning;
Skills;
Tutoring;
Bibliometrics;
Artificial intelligence;
Cluster analysis;
Independent study;
Learning;
Self evaluation;
Leverage;
Technology adoption;
Computer programming
; Dong Xingbo 2
; Zheng, Fang 3 ; Wang Lillian Yee Kiaw 4 ; Jin, Zhe 2
1 School of Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China; [email protected], Shenzhen Longgang LiuYue School, Shenzhen 518000, China
2 School of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui Provincial International Joint Research Center for Advanced Technology in Medical Imaging, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
3 School of Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China; [email protected]
4 School of Information Technology, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia