Content area
This study utilizes the Standard k-ε turbulence model and ANSYS CFX software to tackle silt erosion in the top cover clearances of guide vane of the Francis turbine at Genda Power Station (Minjiang River Basin section, 103°17′ E and 31°06′ N) under sediment-laden flow conditions. A numerical simulation of a solid–liquid two-phase flow along the whole flow route was performed under rated operating circumstances to examine the impact of varying guide vane end clearance heights (0.3 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm) on internal flow patterns and sediment erosion characteristics. The simulation parameters employed an average sediment concentration of 2.9 kg/m3 and a median particle size of 0.058 mm, indicative of the flood season. The findings demonstrate that augmenting the clearance height intensifies leaky flow and secondary flow, resulting in a 0.49% reduction in efficiency. As the gap expanded from 0.3 mm to 1.0 mm, the leakage flow velocity notably increased to 40 m/s, exacerbating flow separation, enlarging the vortex structures in the vaneless space, and augmenting the sediment velocity gradient and concentration, consequently heightening the risk of erosion. An experimental setup was devised based on the numerical results, and the dynamic resemblance between the constructed test section and the prototype turbine was confirmed for flow velocity, concentration, and Reynolds number. Tests on sediment erosion revealed that the erosion resistance of the anti-sediment erosion material 04Cr13Ni5Mo markedly exceeded that of the base cast steel, especially in high-velocity areas. This study delivers a systematic, quantitative analysis of clearance effects on flow and erosion, along with an experimental wear model specifically for the Gengda Power Station, thereby providing direct theoretical support and engineering guidance for its wear protection strategy and maintenance planning.
Details
Vanes;
Vortices;
Reynolds number;
Sediment concentration;
Sediments;
Two phase flow;
Wear;
Efficiency;
Turbines;
Power plants;
Flow pattern;
Simulation;
Velocity;
Turbulence models;
Concentration gradient;
Velocity gradients;
Particle size;
Guide vanes;
Internal flow;
Fluid dynamics;
Secondary flow;
Sediment;
Turbine engines;
Flow separation;
Flow distribution;
Clearances;
Turbulence;
Erosion resistance;
K-epsilon turbulence model;
Soil erosion;
Flow velocity;
Quantitative analysis;
Cavitation;
Velocity gradient;
Multiphase flow;
Mathematical models;
Hydraulics;
Hydroelectric power
; Li, Tianlin 1 ; Yu, Xiao 2 ; Hu Kailiang 1 ; Xu Yaogang 1 ; Liu, Xiaobing 2 1 Sichuan Yingxiuwan Hydropower Plant, Dujiangyan 611830, China
2 Key Laboratory of Fluid and Power Machinery, Ministry of Education, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China