Abstract
Background
The Pomodoro Technique (PT) is a time-management method that splits work into focused intervals punctuated by brief breaks. It aims to boost productivity and counteract mental fatigue. While PT has shown positive effects on cognitive performance in various domains, its application in anatomy education, which demands substantial cognitive effort, remains unexplored. This scoping review aimed to map the existing PT literature and evaluate its relevance to anatomy learning.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) until May 2023, yielding 6,499 records. After removing duplicates and screening the abstracts, 135 full-text articles were reviewed. Thirty-two studies (total N = 5,270; range 25–300; median = 87) met the inclusion criteria, consisting of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five quasi-experimental designs, 24 observational/comparative studies, and studies involving digital/AI-enhanced Pomodoro applications.
Results
Across three RCTs (n = 87), structured Pomodoro intervals (24 min work/6 min break; 12 min work/3 min break) led to approximately 20% lower fatigue, a 0.5-point improvement in distractibility, and a 0.4-point increase in motivation compared to self-paced break schedules. The five quasi-experimental studies (N = 50–200) reported 15–25% increases in self-rated focus and roughly 20% reductions in fatigue. Digital/AI tools enhanced student engagement by 10–18%, with perceived learning efficiency improving by approximately 12% (β = 0.32, p < 0.01). Notably, 88% of all studies showed positive outcomes and 57% utilized validated psychometric measures. However, none have directly focused on the use of PT in anatomy courses.
Conclusions
Time-structured Pomodoro interventions consistently improved focus, reduced mental fatigue, and enhanced sustained task performance, outperforming self‑paced breaks. These benefits are supported by the micro-break literature, cognitive load theory, and metacognitive reinforcement principles. Further research is needed to assess long-term efficacy in anatomy education, ideally through mixed-method studies embedded in anatomy curricula.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




