Content area
Background
Gender inequalities in care of women with cardiopulmonary arrest may be due to lack of training with manikins representing the female thorax. Incorporating this feature in basic life support (BLS) training would support a more equitable and effective response.
Aim
To evaluate the impact of using female torso mannikins in BLS training for nursing students.
Design
Mixed-method study with a sequential explanatory design.
Method
Eighty undergraduate nursing students from a university in northern Spain participated. A quasi-experimental single-group design evaluated a BLS training program. The intervention included training and retraining using simulation with male and female torso manikins. Technical performance, physiological variables and emotional responses were assessed. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted through focus groups to explore students’ experiences and perceptions.
Outcomes
The use of torsos with breasts led to poorer technical performance (initiation time: 14 vs. 9 s; hand placement: 57.5 % vs. 97.5 %; correct use of the automated external defibrillator (AED): 31.3 % vs. 98.8 %; electrode placement: 55 vs. 45.4 s; p < 0.001) and greater physiological activation (heart rate: 90 vs. 76 bpm; perceived stress: 5.0 vs. 3.0; p < 0.001). Retraining with the female torso improved AED use (56.3 % vs. 31.3 %) and compression time (11 vs. 14 s); however, differences with the male torso persisted. Technical and emotional barriers—such as hesitation and uncertainty—aligned with perceptions in focus groups, reinforcing the emotional impact in qualitative phase.
Conclusions
The incorporation of female torsos revealed performance limitations affecting emergency care. Findings support the need for gender-sensitive training in life-saving interventions.
Details
Data Collection;
Self Efficacy;
Researchers;
Heart Disorders;
Mixed Methods Research;
Confidentiality;
Simulated Environment;
Repetition;
Check Lists;
Coding;
Medical Services;
Psychological Patterns;
Professional Training;
Focus Groups;
Males;
Informed Consent;
Females;
Nursing Students;
Nonparametric Statistics;
Retraining;
Qualitative Research;
Ethics;
Data Analysis;
Emotional Response
Intervention;
Students;
Heart rate;
Training;
Perceptions;
College students;
Females;
Gender inequality;
Gender;
Retraining;
Questionnaires;
Simulation;
Quasi-experimental methods;
Anatomical systems;
Emotions;
Life;
Focus groups;
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation--CPR;
Nurses;
Nursing;
Breasts;
Qualitative research;
Emergency medical care;
Life sustaining treatment;
Cardiac arrest;
Manikins;
Women;
Gender differences;
Mixed methods research;
Emergency services;
Compression;
Consent;
Uncertainty;
Emotional responses;
Variables;
Data collection
; Alconero-Camarero, Ana Rosa 2 ; Abajas-Bustillo, Rebeca 3 ; Sarabia-Cobo, Carmen 2 ; Ortego-Maté, Carmen 2 1 Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander 39008, Spain
2 Faculty of Nursing, Universidad de Cantabria, IDIVAL Nursing Research Group, Avda. Valdecilla s/n., Santander 39008, Spain
3 Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Faculty of Nursing. Universidad de Cantabria, IDIVAL Nursing Research Group, Avda. Valdecilla s/n., Santander 39008, Spain