It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study employs the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine factors influencing graduate students' acceptance and use of ChatGPT in academic writing. Despite ChatGPT's growing presence in higher education, limited evidence exists regarding its actual adoption. A modified TAM-based questionnaire was completed by 254 graduate students from four Saudi universities and analyzed using SPSS and JASP. Structural Equation Modeling assessed both direct and indirect effects within a mediation model. Results indicate that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness significantly shape students' attitudes and behavioral intentions toward ChatGPT. However, ease of use only impacts attitudes when mediated by usefulness. Positive attitudes were linked to stronger intentions to use the tool, yet high intentions did not always lead to actual use. Barriers such as limited skills or concerns about academic integrity may hinder this transition.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
2 King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia





