Microstructure (EBSD-KAM)-Informed Selection of Single-Powder Soft Magnetics for Molded Inductors

Abstract

What are the main findings?

EBSD KAM links deformation substructure to hysteresis loss (K_h).

Particle size and shell control eddy loss (K_e); fine SiO₂-coated Fe lowers K_e.

FeSiCr shows the highest μ_i despite the lowest density; coarse size reduces pinning.

DC-bias L retention: CIP > RIP > CIP-P > FeSiCr at 15 A (67.9 > 55.7 > 48.8 > 33.2%).

What is the implication of the main finding?

Microstructure-informed map guides single-powder selection for inductors.

Balance μi, loss, bias, and corrosion via size and shell chemistry.

RIP offers lower loss, greater durability, and greater sustainability vs. FeSiCr/CIP-P.

EBSD/KAM becomes a fast-screening metric for bias and loss.

This study systematically benchmarks the performance of four single soft magnetic powders—water-atomized Fe–Si–Cr (FeSiCr), silica-coated reduced iron powder (RIP), silica-coated carbonyl iron powder (CIP), and phosphate-coated CIP (CIP-P)—to establish quantitative relationships between powder attributes, deformation substructure, and high-frequency loss for molded power inductors (100 kHz–1 MHz). We prepared toroidal compacts at 200 MPa and characterized them by initial permeability (μ_i), core-loss (P_cv(f)), partitioning (P_cv(f) = K_hf + K_ef², K_h, $K_{\mathrm{e}}$: hysteresis and eddy-current loss coefficients), and EBSD (electron backscatter diffraction)-derived microstrain metrics (Kernel Average Misorientation, KAM; low-/high-angle grain-boundary fractions). Corrosion robustness was assessed using a 5 wt% NaCl, 35 °C, 24 h salt-spray protocol. Our findings reveal that FeSiCr achieves the highest μ_i across the frequency band, despite its lowest compaction density. This is attributed to its coarse particle size (D₅₀ ≈ 18 µm) and the resulting lower intragranular pinning. The loss spectra are dominated by hysteresis over this frequency range, with FeSiCr exhibiting the largest K_h, while the fine, silica-insulated Fe powders (RIP/CIP) most effectively suppress K_e. EBSD analysis shows that the high coercivity and hysteresis loss in CIP (and, to a lesser extent, RIP) are correlated with dense, deformation-induced subgrain networks, as evidenced by higher mean KAM and a lower low-angle grain boundary fraction. In contrast, FeSiCr exhibits the lowest KAM, with strain confined primarily to particle contact regions. Corrosion testing ranked durability as FeSiCr ≳ CIP ≈ RIP ≫ CIP-P, which is consistent with the Cr-rich passivation of FeSiCr and the superior barrier properties of the SiO₂ shells compared to low-dose phosphate. At 15 A, inductance retention ranks CIP (67.9%) > RIP (55.7%) > CIP-P (48.8%) > FeSiCr (33.2%), tracking a rise in effective anisotropy and—for FeSiCr—lower M_s that precipitate earlier roll-off. Collectively, these results provide a microstructure-informed selection map for single-powder formulations. We demonstrate that particle size and shell chemistry are the primary factors governing eddy currents (K_e), while the KAM-indexed substructure dictates hysteresis loss (K_h) and DC-bias superposition characteristics. This framework enables rational trade-offs between magnetic permeability, core loss, and environmental durability.