It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Photonic device development (PDD) has achieved remarkable success in designing and implementing new devices for controlling light across various wavelengths, scales, and applications, including telecommunications, imaging, sensing, and quantum information processing. PDD is an iterative, five-step process that consists of: (i) deriving device behavior from design parameters, (ii) simulating device performance, (iii) finding the optimal candidate designs from simulations, (iv) fabricating the optimal device, and (v) measuring device performance. Classically, all these steps involve Bayesian optimization, material science, control theory, and direct physics-driven numerical methods. However, many of these techniques are computationally intractable, monetarily costly, or difficult to implement at scale. In addition, PDD suffers from large optimization landscapes, uncertainties in structural or optical characterization, and difficulties in implementing robust fabrication processes. However, the advent of machine learning over the past decade has provided novel, data-driven strategies for tackling these challenges, including surrogate estimators for speeding up computations, generative modeling for noisy measurement modeling and data augmentation, reinforcement learning for fabrication, and active learning for experimental physical discovery. In this review, we present a comprehensive perspective on these methods to enable machine-learning-assisted PDD (ML-PDD) for efficient design optimization with powerful generative models, fast simulation and characterization modeling under noisy measurements, and reinforcement learning for fabrication. This review will provide researchers from diverse backgrounds with valuable insights into this emerging topic, fostering interdisciplinary efforts to accelerate the development of complex photonic devices and systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Park, Taehyuk 3 ; Wilson, Blake A 1 ; Iyer, Vaishnavi 1 ; Bezick, Michael 4 ; Jae-Ik Choi 1 ; Ojha, Rohan 4 ; Mahendran, Pravin 4 ; Singh, Daksh Kumar 1 ; Chitturi, Geetika 4 ; Chen, Peigang 1 ; Do, Trang 4 ; Kildishev, Alexander V 4 ; Shalaev, Vladimir M 1 ; Moebius, Michael 5 ; Cai, Wenshan 6 ; Liu, Yongmin 7 ; Boltasseva, Alexandra 1 1 Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Quantum Science Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Draper Scholar, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
3 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
4 Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
5 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
6 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA; School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
7 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA





