Content area

Abstract

Traditional studies of semantic prosody, often relying on manual observation of limited concordance lines, face constraints such as small scale, susceptibility to subjective judgment, and difficulties in capturing emotional nuances in broader contexts. This study introduces sentiment analysis to conduct a contrastive investigation of semantic prosody in English and Chinese, with a focus on adverbs expressing completeness. The findings reveal that the specific context or "span" of text significantly influences the observed polarity strength of semantic prosody. Sentiment analysis incorporating contextual and syntactic factors yields more precise and nuanced results. Differences in semantic prosody between translational equivalents in the two languages reflect disparities in lexicalization patterns: English employs a wider range of adverbs to convey subtle emotional distinctions, while Chinese relies on more generalized terms with broader semantic ranges and an overall positive tendency. This research demonstrates the potential of computational methods in semantic prosody and contrastive linguistics, offering an efficient and scalable approach to data-driven analysis.

Details

1009240
Business indexing term
Title
A Contrastive Study of Semantic Prosody Based on Sentiment Analysis: The Case of Adverbs of Completeness in English and Chinese
Author
Ding, Guoqi; Zhu, Yuanxuan 1 

 Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China 
Publication title
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
780-785
Number of pages
7
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
Hill Publishing Group Inc
Place of publication
Elmhurst
Country of publication
United States
Publication subject
ISSN
25757938
e-ISSN
25757946
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
ProQuest document ID
3273072451
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/contrastive-study-semantic-prosody-based-on/docview/3273072451/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025. This article is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-12-03
Database
ProQuest One Academic