Content area
Advancements in neuroscience, cybernetics, and psychology have catalyzed the nascent interdisciplinary field of neuropsychology and cybersecurity(neurocyberpsychology). This emerging area of research investigates the intricate interactions between the human brain, cognition, and technological systems synthesizing the prime developments in the origin, growth, conceptualisation, methods, applications and future horizons. Early roots lie in the cybernetics as well as neural, cognitive, and social psychological sciences provided historical groundwork for present-day neurocyberpsychology. Core conceptual frameworks integrate theories of neural computation, extended cognition, neuroplasticity, and human-computer interaction. Neuro-imaging, data mining, brain-computer interfacing, and virtual reality techniques comprise main research methodologies. Major current foci include augmented cognition, brain-computer interfaces for motor and sensory function, cognitive neural modelling, virtual reality systems, and impacts of social media and video games on the brain. Clinical uses are also emerging in neural prosthetics, neuro-feedback therapies, and technological aids for psychological conditions. At the same time, neuroethical considerations spotlight dilemmas regarding security, identity, normality, addiction, and human dignity within an increasingly computerized society. To advance human flourishing amidst accelerating technological immersion, the review highlights priorities around integrative knowledge, cognitive augmentation, participatory research, interdisciplinary learning, and compassionate ethics.
ABSTRACT
Advancements in neuroscience, cybernetics, and psychology have catalyzed the nascent interdisciplinary field of neuropsychology and cybersecurity(neurocyberpsychology). This emerging area of research investigates the intricate interactions between the human brain, cognition, and technological systems synthesizing the prime developments in the origin, growth, conceptualisation, methods, applications and future horizons. Early roots lie in the cybernetics as well as neural, cognitive, and social psychological sciences provided historical groundwork for present-day neurocyberpsychology. Core conceptual frameworks integrate theories of neural computation, extended cognition, neuroplasticity, and human-computer interaction. Neuro-imaging, data mining, brain-computer interfacing, and virtual reality techniques comprise main research methodologies. Major current foci include augmented cognition, brain-computer interfaces for motor and sensory function, cognitive neural modelling, virtual reality systems, and impacts of social media and video games on the brain. Clinical uses are also emerging in neural prosthetics, neuro-feedback therapies, and technological aids for psychological conditions. At the same time, neuroethical considerations spotlight dilemmas regarding security, identity, normality, addiction, and human dignity within an increasingly computerized society. To advance human flourishing amidst accelerating technological immersion, the review highlights priorities around integrative knowledge, cognitive augmentation, participatory research, interdisciplinary learning, and compassionate ethics.
Keywords - Artificial Intelligence, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Human Cognition, Neurotechnology, Neurocyberpsychology
Date of Submission: June 01, 2025 Date of Acceptance: June 29, 2025
I. INTRODUCTION
The fields of neuroscience, cybernetics, and psychology have all propounded critical advances in the comprehension of human mind and behaviour. The intriguing intersections between these sciences in recent decades have given rise to the escalating multidisciplinary field of neurocyberpsychology, bridging together the ideas from the domain of psychology, cybernetics, and neuroscience to establish and modernize the way the trilogy deals with.
In neuroscience, many technological and biological research techniques are used to explore the nervous system, with a primary focus on the brain often offering a critical lens that enables to visualize the interface between human mind and machine by elucidating the implicit brain working. This area of study has made significant unearthing on the anatomy and physiology of the brain, improvising the in-depth know-how of thought, feeling, perception, and behaviour. With the advent of cutting-edge imaging methods such as MRI and CT scans that allow researchers to visualize what happens in the brain while performing various types of mental tasks, the biological bases of neural networks as highlighted by studies of neurotransmitters, neural networks, and plasticity also deals with a wide range of issues, including learning and memory[1] motor control[2], sensory systems, brain development[3], and neurological illnesses.
Cybernetics, a key concept that entered into the picture in the mid-20th century through the pioneering work of mathematicians like Norbert Wiener, who defined it as the study of control and communication in both living creatures and machines as the feedback loop, whereby outputs obtained are fed back into the system as inputs, allowing for self-regulation. Cybernetics applies this principle to explain how organisms and autonomous systems operate via control mechanisms[4]. For instance, thermostats utilize cybernetic feedback to maintain a set temperature. In humans, cybernetics examines how sensory information shapes behavior. The subsumption architecture of robotics drew inspiration from cybernetics by organizing behavioral control systems into layers. Connections between cybernetics and neuroscience stimulated new ideas about neural networks in the brain. Cybernetics provides neurocyberpsychology with a framework for investigating the adaptive interaction between brains and technology. Psychology analyzes the human mind and behavior using empirical research methods. Topics span biological processes, cognition, motivation, personality, disorders, and applied domains[5]. Experimental psychology tests cause-and-effect relationships using controlled variables. Cognitive psychology models mental abilities like attention, perception, memory and problem solving Neuropsychology explores neural correlates of psychological phenomena. This breadth of knowledge about human thought, emotion and actions lead psychology unique insights into the impacts of technology on users' minds and lives.
Integrating concepts from these three disciplines, neurocyberpsychology seeks to comprehensively understand how technology shapes and is shaped by human psychology and neurobiology. A leading area of research is brain-computer interfaces (BCI) which connect brains to computers using implanted or external electrodes. BCIs can allow quadriplegic patients to control prosthetic limbs neurally, or enable video game control via brain signals. Cognitive modeling applies neural networks to emulate brain computations and human cognition. Other topics include neuroplasticity changes triggered by internet use, neural markers of social media addiction, VR's effects on emotion and cognition, and cyberpsychology of human-robot interaction[6]. As technologies like AI, robotics and VR become more immersive, understanding their cognitive and neural implications is crucial. Neuro-cyberpsychology provides an integrative lens to explore human-technology convergence.
The intermingling of neuroscience, cybernetics and psychology in studying brain-machine connections generates fertile ground for discovery. Neuro-cyberpsychology integrates these diverse disciplines to elucidate how technologies shape and reflect the human mind. This emerging field has the potential to reveal profound insights about cognition, behavior and our relationship with technology.
II. BACKGROUND
The consequent development of neuro-cyberpsychology was made possible in larger parts by the inception of cybernetics in the 1940s and 1950 by Norbert Wiener, a mathematician and co-founder who used the conceptualisation of feedback control systems into a variety of fields including human-machine interaction, neurophysiology, and biology. Self-regulating systems that use feedback loops to modify operations are a fundamental principle of cybernetics. Wiener proposed parallels between neurological and mechanical regulation. In his book Cybernetics, Wiener described the brain as "a computing machine connected with an effecting mechanism" and put forward using computation to analyze neurological phenomenon pertaining the conceptualisation of information theory and automation to neural systems which laid the groundwork for connections between cybernetics and neuroscience. Wiener collaborated with neuroscientists, psychologists and engineers to explore cybernetic brain models which helped pioneers in framing a conceptual framework for exploring the analogies between brains, computers and information systems.
In subsequent decades, a number of researchers conducted influential studies integrating cybernetic theory with neuroscience. Researchers like Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts deployed abstract neural networks inspired by cybernetics that laid the foundations for modern artificial neural networks[7]. Neurophysiologist W. Ross Ashby built on McCulloch and Pitts' neural networks in his book proposed cybernetic models of adaptive behavior and learning in the brain[8]. Frank Fremont-Smith and Walter Rudolph compiled an early collection of writings from psychologists, neuroscientists and mathematicians exploring connections between neurophysiology and cybernetics. They noted parallels between principles of feedback regulation in machines and living systems. In 1967, Georgopoulos et al. published seminal research recording neural activity in monkey motor cortices that established the foundations of brain-computer interface research for motor neuroprosthetics. These studies exemplified early endeavors to unite cybernetic and neurological concepts.
Edifice on this preliminary work, neurocyberpsychology intermingled into a neo defined subfield during the 1990s and 2000s. Rapid advances in neuroscience and cybernetics, alongside proliferation of digital technology, set the stage for formally integrating these domains into a new inter-discipline. The International Association of Cybernetic Studies helped foster connections between cybernetics and neural, behavioral and social sciences. In 1993, Paul Young coined the term "cyberpsychology" to describe psychological impacts of emerging cyber technologies like the internet[9]. While not focused on the brain, this highlighted interactions between technology and human psychology. The rise of actual brain-computer interfaces in the 1990s demonstrated the reality of direct neural communication with computers.
In the early 2000s, Kevin Warwick's experiments with chip implants that interfaced his own nervous system with computers provided concrete neurocyberpsychological research[10]. The first academic conferences and journals using the label neurocyberpsychology emerged in the mid-2000s. Textbooks and academic programs in neurocyberpsychology also appeared, reflecting its growth as a distinct discipline[11].
The proliferation of brain imaging methods like EEG, MEG, PET and fMRI from the 1990s onward gave researchers powerful new tools to relate neural activity with technological interfaces[12]. Neurocyberpsychology crystallized around studying the interplay between cybernetics, neural processes, cognition and digital technologies. While nascent compared to more established fields, neurocyberpsychology continues to develop through increasing cross-pollination between disciplines. The conceptual seeds planted decades ago now blossom through rapid advances in cybernetics, neuroscience, psychology, and human-computer interaction. This emerging synthesis holds exciting potential for research integrating minds and machines. This emerging synthesis holds exciting potential for research integrating minds and machines.
III. CORE CONCEPTS
Neurocyberpsychology draws from a range of theoretical perspectives and preliminary concepts to contrive an integrated know-how of neural and cognitive interactions with technology. Examining the core ideas that underpin this emerging field provides a foundation for current research and future directions. Major concepts include neural networks and brain modeling, the brain as an information processing system, extended cognition through technology, and theories of how technology shapes and reflects neural functioning.
3.1 Neural Networks and Brain Modeling
The conceptualisation of neural networks emerged in the 1940s with early efforts to mathematically model neurological systems. Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts proposed simplified artificial neurons with inputs and outputs that could perform computational functions[13]. By connecting these model neurons into networks and adjusting their connections, researchers could emulate some functions of biological neural nets.
This pioneering work influenced later neural networks that could adapt via machine learning algorithms. Backpropagation algorithms enabled neural nets to adjust their connection weights during training to minimize errors, modeling learning in the brain[14]. Deep neural networks with multiple layers drew inspiration from the layered architecture of biological brains. Convolutional neural networks added connectivity patterns mimicking animal visual cortex. Modern techniques like deep learning and artificial neural networks continue to be informed by neuroscience, supporting advanced functions such as computer vision, speech recognition and natural language processing. In turn, studying artificial neural networks provides insight into how information processing might occur in the brain. Neural networks remain a core area linking neuroscience with cybernetics and psychology.
3.2 The Brain as an Information Processing System
Neurocyberpsychology also draws from the conceptual model of the brain as an information processing system. Early cyberneticists like Norbert Wiener compared the brain to computing machines due to their shared capacity for information storage, processing and control[15]. Cognitive psychologists adopted computational metaphors to model the input-processing-output sequence of cognition. Information theory provides a quantitative framework for analyzing neural codes, storage capacity, signal transmission, noise filtering and information flow in brain circuits. Conceptualizing cognition in terms of data representations, transformations and computations aids computational modeling of brain functions[16]. While a simplified view compared to messy biological complexity, the brain-as-computer analogy remains relevant for neurocyberpsychology research on neural computation and human-machine interfaces.
3.3 Extended Cognition Through Technology
The hypothesis of extended cognition proposes that human cognition can encompass processes beyond the head, including interactions with technological systems. This contrasts with internalist views restricting cognition to brain-based computations. Arguing that tools like notebooks or calculators are integrated into some cognitive routines, extended cognition theorists contend that neural substrates alone don't determine the mind. In neurocyberpsychology, extended cognition provides a model for how brain functions couple with digital technologies. For instance, machine learning algorithms might complement information storage and retrieval carried out internally. BCIs literally extend neural processing into control of external devices. While debated, extended cognition offers a conceptual base for exploring brain-machine cognition[17].
3.4 Theories of Neurocognitive Impacts of Technology
Neurocyberpsychologists have applied diverse theoretical lenses to explicate how different technologies shape and reflect neural function and cognition:
* The neural plasticity hypothesis contends internet use induces rewiring of brain circuits, particularly in frequent technology users[18]. This draws support from research on altered neural processing and reduced gray matter in some brain regions of internet addicts. Plasticity theories illuminate potential long-term neurobiological impacts of human-computer interaction.
* The global workspace theory posits consciousness emerges from widespread information sharing through a globally interconnected neural workspace. This implies digital networks extending human social communication channels may expand opportunities for collective consciousness.
* Activity theory examines how human development is mediated by cultural tools for communication and thinking that transform neurocognitive processes over time. From writing to AI, activity theory analyzes cognitive technologies as mediating artifacts.
* Media naturalness theory holds that online behavior diverges from innate face-to-face communication norms, creating cognitive effects from insufficient naturalistic social cues. This lens simplifies digital media environments may shape cognition by altering evolved communication = patterns. Integrating such theories allows neurocyberpsychology to relate neural and cognitive functions to dimensions of human technology use. Ongoing theoretical developments will further advance understanding of brain-machine interactions.
IV. METHODOLOGY
The methodology adopted to conduct the research on the novelty of the concept has been highlighted through fig 1.
The study was guided by a systematically ordered and interdisciplinary approach aimed at investigating the expanding literature baseline in neuroscience, cybernetics and psychology with regard to cybersecurity through the process of development as well as synthesis. The general aim of the work was to create a subtle vision of how cognition, behavioral, systemic knowledge can collaborate to improve the cyber defense systems and lead to the creation of neuro-integrated security frameworks. To start the process, the exact definition of the research objectives was used. The first step to it was the formulation of main research questions which hung around the topics, how human thinking, neural reactions, mental patterns and cybernetic feedback mechanisms can affect or aid the activities of cybersecurity. Thanks to defining the thematic scope and the overall conceptual statement prepared in advance, the study provided a purpose-oriented and substantive review of the literature that corresponds to both technological and cognitive arenas.
The literature review was carried out after the goal interpretation stage followed a systematic and thorough search of the literature in the academic databases such as IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and Google Scholar. The Boolean operators and the discipline-related keywords (including the phrase neuroscience and cybersecurity, brain-computer interfaces and threat detection, cybernetic models in decision-making, and psychological profiling in digital forensics) helped the search strategy. The inclusion criteria were deliberately considered strict as they applied only to peer-reviewed studies published since 2020 to make the findings current and relevant. This produced a pool that was refined to produce a set of academic papers, after which studies conducted on their respective abstracts and titles were screened as to relevance, and those that passed, thoroughly assessed through the use of the full text, as related to the study in terms of its interdisciplinary nature.
After identifying the appropriate literature to be used, a step of intensive reading, critical appraisal and thematic notes was performed on the papers. Not only this process was manual, but also tools of qualitative data analysis were used, like NVivo and helped identify latent patterns and embedded insights in a variety of academic texts. Codes of methodological rigor, theoretical foundation and inclusion of conceptual connections across fields of knowledge were given. Such careful examination allowed the scholar to sketch out main topics and attitudes that appeared in the data. At this point, the major thematic constructs were sorted out based on the disciplinary perspective; that is, neuroscience, cybernetics and psychology. None of these categories were exclusive of each other but were more like overlapping circles of influence centered on similar issues mostly including human behavior, threat response, cognitive models and adaptive system design.
As a result of such a classification, the study continued to label and extract essential themes, frequent viewpoints, and nascent conceptual gaps. This consisted of an integrative reading regarding the contributions of such fields as neuroscience in understanding decision-making and emotional regulatory responses in an event related to cybersecurity; the role of cybernetics in the understanding of feedback loops, systems resilience, and control over systems; and on the psychological theories underlying the interpretation of behavior under stressful environments, detection of deception, and cognition with respect to user interfaces. It is these thematic clusters that were later on pulled together into a coherent body of knowledge that pointed out to the mutual enrichment that can be achieved when these disciplines are placed within a common framework of analyses.
Upon synthesis of findings, the relationships were analysed between the identified elements of the research. This step aimed at demonstrating the way the cognitive processes engage with systemic feedback and the transfer of psychological profiles into computation models of prediction and detection of anomalies in the behavior. The interrelationship of interdependence between the two phenomena of neural responses and psychological triggering and cybernetic architectures was able to detect multidimensional relationships that were poorly addressed in previous work. Such relations were then provided within a more general conceptual map that would potentially be utilized in theoretical models as well as applied systems in neuro-cybersecurity systems.
The reflection of the limitation and research gaps in the reviewed literature was the following step. A number of gaps were identified, which include: the lack of longitudinal researches on neural behavioral patterns in a cyber environment, the absence of empirical validation on models of neuro-inspired detection, and ethical blind areas in processing neural data. What is more, even though there was extensive research on the subject within neuroscience, cybernetics, or psychology, really integrated ones were not prevalent, which is why interdisciplinary research designs were in dire need. These deficiencies were described in a systematic manner and employed in coming up with specific questions to be answered in the future.
The study itself then tried to reduce the results to a wider socio-technical and ethical context, in an attempt to gain further explanatory power and relevance of the results. This involved the considerations of brain surveillance technologies, the significance of the emergence of cognitive rights and the social effects of neuro-integrated cyber defenses. This contextualization made the study go beyond the specifics of disciplinary interests, but generate a panorama perspective on the changing terrain of the cybersecurity domain in the context of human cognition and behavior. Lastly, the methodology ended with an examination of the larger meaning of its research as well as its practical considerations on the synthesized findings. The paper highlighted the idea that knowing how to deal with neural and psychological aspects of cybersecurity is not only an academic activity but a requirement in creating a system that can anticipate threats, adjust dynamically to behavioral abnormalities and implement cognitive data ethically. This gleaming disposition helped it of the research to provide a strategic direction on the research priorities about the neuro-cybersecurity in the future with the suggestion of the collaborative, ethically sound, and scientific rigor agenda in the future.
Even though this study advances a unified theoretical model based on literature synthesis (see Figure 1), it does not offer empirical findings. The future research will include its operationalization (presented in experiments) and cross-domain confirmation to determine how well the framework should work in actual cybersecurity scenarios.
V. CURRENT RESEARCH AREAS
Neurocyberpsychology - encompasses a range of contemporary research topics investigating how brain and cognition interact with different forms of technology. Major research areas include brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), cognitive neural modeling, human-technology effects on neuroplasticity, virtual reality and augmented cognition, and studies of social media, gaming and online behavior.
5.1 Brain-Computer Interfaces and Neuroprosthetics
A protuberant research domain focuses preliminary on brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that enables head on communication pathways between the mind and technology which helps in decoding neural signals using implanted electrodes or noninvasive scalp electrodes to translate thoughts, perceptions and intentions into control signals for external devices. This facilitates mind-machine interaction for a variety of applications. Invasive BCIs using implanted electrode arrays can achieve high quality neural recordings, but entail risks[19]. Non-invasive methods use EEG caps or fNIRS optical imaging to avoid surgery, with tradeoffs in signal quality[20]. Common input modalities include motor imagery, visual evoked potentials, P300 event-related potentials, and SSVEP steady-state visually evoked potentials.
BCI applications include assistive devices, neurofeedback therapies, and human enhancement. Neuroprosthetics restore capabilities to patients with sensory-motor deficits using robotic limbs, spellers, or speech synthesizers controlled neurally. BCIs enable "locked-in" patients with paralysis to communicate and operate assistive robots. Experimental BCIs can also enhance cognition in healthy users through neurofeedback training or transcranial brain stimulation[21]. While most current systems involve simple command signals, progress towards naturalistic BCIs could enable seamless thought-based control and augmentation. This raises complex ethical issues around privacy, identity and regulation that neurocyberpsychology = explores. Mainstream BCI applications may emerge within years as research develops more powerful, convenient interfaces as indicated in table 1.
5.2 Cognitive Modeling with Neural Networks
Advances in neural networks and deep learning drive progress in computational cognitive modeling to emulate human mental capabilities through ncuro-inspired Al systems. Cognitive architectures integrate neural models with theoretical frameworks from cognitive psychology to simulate functions like attention, memory, language and planning[22]. Deep neural networks are applied to mimic high-level brain processing for functions such as visual object recognition, speech comprehension, reading, emotion recognition and navigation. Models incorporate brain design principles like hierarchical modular networks, recurrent connectivity, and spike timing dependent plasticity rules. Algorithms for curiosity, imagination and meta-plasticity also emulate neurocognitive mechanisms.
While simplified compared to biological complexity, neural cognitive models advance understanding of potential information processing pathways in the brain. At the same time, neuroscience discoveries about learning and computation inform development of more brain-like artificial intelligence. This synergistic cycle drives progress in both neuroscience and machine learning. The cognitive functions modeled by different neural networks has been highlighted in table 2.
5.3 Human-Technology Interaction Effects on Neuroplasticity
An increasing research focus examines how technology usage affects neural function and structure through neuroplasticity, producing measurable changes in the brain[23]. The malleable connectivity of neural circuits enables remodeling in response to experience, which can have adaptive or maladaptive effects. Technologies like video games or social media constitute highly novel and immersive environments that may shape developing and adult brains via plasticity as indicated in table 3.
Some studies reveal structural changes in brain regions associated with technology overuse, such as atrophied gray matter in internet addicts. Functional changes also emerge like altered connectivity in teens' cognitive control networks after just one week of social media abstinence. On the positive side, video games are linked to enhanced visuospatial cognition and multitasking abilities. Training studies induce targeted plasticity changes using neurofeedback, meditation apps, or brain stimulation paired with cognitive tasks.
Understanding neuroplastic adaptation to modern technological environments remains critical for optimizing educational and clinical technologies while mitigating unintended neurological consequences. Further research should clarify causal relationships between specific usage patterns and plasticity-driven brain changes. Tracking longitudinal trajectories across development will shed light on whether alterations persist or revert after technology cessation.
5.4 Virtual Reality and Augmented Cognition
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) tools present immersive digital environments and overlay information onto real-world perception. Neurocyberpsychological research investigates how these technologies shape and reflect cognition and brain function. Studies indicate VR can influence spatial processing, emotion, motivation and social cognition via heightened simulation of sensorimotor experiences[24].
A major focus examines using VR or AR systems to augment human cognition. For instance, AR devices can overlay navigational cues onto visual environments to assist memory and enhance spatial knowledge acquisition in trainees. VR platforms provide controlled environments to study learning, decision-making and neural rehabilitation. Multisensory VR training may boost cognition by stimulating neuroplasticity in aging.
However, risks also emerge from extended immersion in artificial environments decoupled from direct physical experience and social cues. Research must address possible psychological dissociation or maladaptive neural effects from overlaying digital data onto biological senses. Ethical challenges also arise regarding data privacy in augmented reality applications. Overall, VR and AR present opportunities accompanied by complex challenges at the intersection of minds and machines as indicated in table 4.
5.5 Neurocyberpsychology of Social Media, Gaming and Online Behavior
Rapidly evolving online environments present challenges and opportunities to understand how digital technologies shape and reflect cognition and behavior. Specific research directions include:
* Social media effects on wellbeing: Linked to altered mood and cognition due to social comparison or digital engagement habits.
* Problematic internet use: Excessive or compulsive internet behaviors may act on brain pathways similarly to drug addiction.
* Multitasking: Media multitasking correlated with poorer cognitive control and increased impulsivity.
* Cognitive training games: Puzzle video games can alter neural networks and enhance processing speed and working memory capacity.
* Online learning: Educational technology tools influence neural processes for memory encoding and retrieval in diverse learners.
* Human-robot interaction: Social neural mechanisms are activated by humanized robots and AI raising implications for social cognition.
Ethical challenges also emerge regarding persuasive design encouraging addictive technology usage, especially in youth. Overall, research is imperative to maximize cognitive benefits of emerging technologies while minimizing potential psychological or neurological harms.
VI. APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
Advances in neurocyberpsychology are opening doors to promising real-world applications while also raising complex ethical and social implications. Major directions include clinical uses, enhanced human-technology interaction, artificial cognition systems, promoting psychological wellbeing online, and grappling with emerging ethical challenges.
Clinical Applications
A major applied focus of neurocyberpsychology is developing clinical interventions and assistive technologies for patients with neurological and psychological conditions based on understanding brain-machine interaction which enable paralyzed patients to communicate and control external devices using neural signals as indicated in table 5. Invasive BCIs implanted in the motor cortex have allowed paralyzed patients to control robotic arms and restore reaching/grasping movements. Noninvasive BCIs using EEG recordings of brain activity have been incorporated into communication tools, wheelchairs, and neuroprosthetics.
Additionally, neurofeedback training uses real-time display of brain activity to teach self-regulation of neural patterns, helping treat conditions like ADHD[25]. Virtual reality therapies create simulated treatment scenarios aiding disorders like phobias or PTSD. And robotic pets and humanoid agents leverage social cognition mechanisms for mental health applications. Clinical neurocyberpsychology promotes diagnostics and therapies capitalizing on neural interfaces.
Enhanced Human-Technology Interaction
Neurocyberpsychology also seeks to apply basic research on brain-machine communication to create technologies allowing faster, more intuitive interactions. BCIs could enable hands-free control of devices through neural signals. Neural sensors detecting cognitive states could allow technologies to adapt in real time to user engagement or overload. Multimodal systems uniting BCIs, computer vision, and speech recognition can integrate multiple brain-derived inputs for seamless interaction[26]. Affective computing technologies sense emotional states from facial expressions, speech patterns and neural data to enhance empathetic human-computer communication. Experiments with augmented reality highlight the potential for technologies overlaying the senses to boost memory, learning and work efficiency. Neurocyberpsychological insights will be instrumental in shaping emerging interactive technologies as indicated in table 6.
AI and Simulated Cognition
The interdisciplinary conjunction of neuroscience and Al within neurocyberpsychology also enables development of advanced neural and cognitive computing systems. Knowledge of biological learning mechanisms guides bio-inspired AI incorporating brain design principles like hierarchical modular networks, spiking neural nets, and plasticity processes. This allows more powerful Al learning and decision-making.
Simulated cognition systems model aspects of perception, cognition, memory and motivation on brain computations. Whole brain emulations remain distant, but neurocyberpsychology contributes neural constraints and network architectures to move towards this goal[27]. Researchers are also coupling biological and simulated neural networks for brain-inspired hybrid intelligence. While raising ethical questions, neurocyberpsychology may accelerate progress in artificial general intelligence by integrating neural reverse engineering with Al, examples of which are indicated in table 7.
Psychological Wellbeing in Online Spaces
Neurocyberpsychological insights into the neural impacts of digital technology use can also guide design and policies for improving psychological wellbeing online. Similar to nutrition or ergonomics, a "brain-healthy" design approach optimizes technologies and online environments for positive cognitive outcomes[28].
Research-based strategies include avoiding addictive design patterns that hijack neural reward systems, empowering user customization and self-regulation, incorporating positive social reinforcement, and balancing immersive escape with real connectivity. Neurocyberpsychology provides biological markers assessing cognitive impacts of technology alongside design principles enhancing health and flourishing, examples of which are indicated in table 8.
Emerging Ethical Challenges
While promising, neurocyberpsychology applications warrant caution given complex ethical dimensions. Direct brain-computer integration raises concerns around privacy, manipulation, dehumanization and social control. Uploading minds to machines involves philosophical issues of identity and consciousness. The possible creation of conscious artificial intelligence also represents an immense responsibility requiring great wisdom and care[29].
Neurocyberpsychology contributes empirical grounding and neuroethical analysis to guide wise advancements. Ongoing research must proactively address emerging issues including: equitable access to enhancements, personalized ads and manipulation based on brain metrics, addiction as unethical design, blurring of reality vs fantasy, loss of wisdom and identity in outsourcing cognition to technology, potential issues of privacy, bodily autonomy, and personal identity with invasive neural interfaces or implants. Humanistic values of dignity, justice, freedom, responsibility and human flourishing must orient neurocyberpsychology amidst profound technological change. By illuminating both wondrous possibilities and sobering perils of brain-machine integration, neurocyberpsychological research can guide advancement of wise, ethical applications benefitting humanity.
VII. THE ROAD AHEAD
The emerging field of neurocyberpsychology stands poised for rapid growth and development in coming decades through leveraging technological and scientific advances. Key directions involve harnessing progress in neuroscience and Al, cognitive enhancement, expanding real-world implementations, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.
Integrating Advances in Neuroscience and AI
Progress in neurocyberpsychology will partially rely on capitalizing on accelerating discoveries in neuroscience to reveal deeper insights into brain structure, function and plasticity. Advanced neural imaging, neural network modeling, optogenetics manipulation, and other emerging techniques will provide new windows into the neurobiological substrates underlying cognition and behavior. This expanded understanding of the brain's computational properties and adaptability can then inform the development of optimized neural interfaces and systems[26]. Equally important will be leveraging exponential gains in artificial intelligence and machine learning, including advances in deep learning, neural network optimization, predictive analytics, and meta-learning. Neurocyberpsychology can help guide these AI systems towards human-like learning and intelligence by providing biological constraints and validation metrics based on neural and cognitive mechanisms. The fusion of leading edge neuroscience with cutting edge AI will supercharge the field.
Augmenting Cognition with Neurotechnologies
A major direction will involve using neurocyberpsychology principles to develop technologies augmenting human cognition at both psychological and neural levels. BCIs could enhance memory capacity by interfacing external data storage devices with the brain's medial temporal lobe. Augmented reality systems overlaying sensory environments with information may speed learning, decision-making, and skill acquisition[29]. Wearable neural sensors could provide realtime neurofeedback for metacognitive self-regulation during learning or work. Optogenetics and electromagnetic brain stimulation techniques may modulate cognitive processes like attention and memory consolidation by tuning brain network dynamics. Pharmaceutical cognitive enhancers could synergize with neurotechnology interventions. While raising ethical issues, advancement of safe, effective cognitive augmentations can expand human potential.
Real-world Implementations
For neurocyberpsychology to fully deliver on its promise, research breakthroughs must translate into practical real-world applications improving lives. BCIs, neuroprosthetics and neural diagnostics will need deployment in clinics, hospitals and consumer markets. Educational institutions can implement immersive, adaptive learning technologies guided by cognitive neuroscience and AI. Companies can apply neurocyberpsychology to enhance products through neural usability testing and brain-centered design. And policy contexts like public health and technology regulation will need ncurocyberpsychological expertise to maximize benefits and minimize harms of emerging neurotechnologies. Widespread adoption of validated assessments and interventions from neurocyberpsychology can drive progress across medicine, education, human augmentation, mental health, human-computer interaction and beyond[30]. This success will require collaborative implementation research to ensure neurocyberpsychology solutions address real user needs and integrate effectively into complex technological and organizational systems.
Interdisciplinary Convergence
Fundamentally, fostering linkages between individuals, concepts, and methods from many scientific fields and application domains will be essential to the future development of neurocyberpsychology. Collaboration and communication are required among biomedical engineers, data scientists, psychologists, designers, educators, physicians, and entrepreneurs, spanning traditional boundaries. The relationship between the brain and machine may be fully understood by the combination of research from the fields of clinical medicine, computer science, neurology, cybernetics, humanities, and social sciences. Research networks, workshops, conferences, and shared datasets can all help to foster these interdisciplinary connections. Moreover, participatory research models engaging diverse communities and stakeholders will help align neurocyberpsychology advancements with public interests, values and priorities. Through inclusive collaboration that bridges fields and perspectives, neurocyberpsychology can evolve into a mature nexus science supporting human flourishing in an increasingly technological world, yet there remains several research questions to be delved upon as indicated in table 9.
VIII. CONCLUSION
Neurocyberpsychology has solidified into an identifiable interdisciplinary science, evolving out of decades of dynamic relationships among cybernetics, neuroscience and psychology. With digital technologies invading everyday life, the fact that a single framework including those areas is necessary became clearer. Various developments whose emergence has formed the foundation of this integration are key aspects here including the emergence of ubiquitous computing, development in non-invasive brain imaging (e.g., EEG, fMRI), and psychological exploration of digital media. Brain-computer-interaction experiments were also an indication that combining neural science with technology has transformative power.
On the basis of it, in its essence, neurocyberpsychology pulls together theoretical paradigms and technological creativity. It utilises brain models as adaptive information-processing systems, the extended mind hypothesis, neuroplasticity and biologically inspired neural networks. Types of studies are real-time neuroimaging, virtual and augmented reality (VR/ AR) experiments, brain computer interfaces (BCs) and digital behavioral data analysis. Some of these active research fronts include computational cognitive modeling and immersive media to brain-computer interface-based therapies and digital neuroplasticity.
However, there are great ethical implications with such advancements. With neural technologies increasingly being intertwined with artificial intelligence and immersive media, the discipline will also have to place primary emphasis on human values; the prior importance should be given to Justice, autonomy, dignity, and empathy. To create ethical frameworks, a responsible technological development at the level of capabilities, technologies should be transformed to contribute not to the reduction of human well-being, but to its increase.Notably, nceurocyberpsychology indicates a paradigm shift, a shift towards the consideration of human mind as deeply situated, socially embedded and technologically extended. As with revolutions in quantum physics or in systems theory, this field forces us to reconsider the edges between the chief phyla of brain and machine, self and environment, biology and computation.
Neurocyberpsychology would be such a guiding star in a modern fast changing world of artificial intelligence and virtual communities. It challenges us to explore vexed issues: In what ways is the thinking transforming due to a continual connection? How should the integration of brains and machines go? Can such technological aids as VR be used as a means of therapy and pedagogy? The discipline is not merely dedicated to giving answers but also asking the right questions given its scientific characteristics, ethical rules, and the desire to achieve flourishing.
Finally, the neurocyberpsychology appears to be a discipline that is shaped to address the needs of the 21 st century being grounded in being interdisciplinary, dynamic, ethically-aware, human-oriented. It does not conform to old academic distinctions to delve into profound mutual relationships among cognition, culture and code. Although synthesizing methods and systems of knowledge is not an easy task, the possibility of transformation that such an integration promises, makes such an effort worthwhile.
Neurocyberpsychology has the potential to create a future where technology is useful to people through collaboration in neuroscience, psychology, computer science, ethics, design, and policy. It has emerged on the pages of science fiction to the laboratories of today, providing some order and purpose to a common goal, managing and exploring human mind in the more and more digitalized world. In that perspective, neurocyberpsychology remains not only an object of study, but also a guide, a map to a more mindful, powerful and connected future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Not Applicable
AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUTION
The theme of how neuroscience, cybernetics, and psychology can be used in a cybersecurity system is an original idea of the author. The author established the research design and methodological flow (Figure 1) through the iterative process of reviewing available literature and identifying gaps. The literature survey was extensive and covered several databases, and thematic coding and synthesis following the use of qualitative researching tools were conducted by the author, who established the major conceptual framework of neurocyberpsychology. The author performed all writing, visualization (tables and figure), critical interpretation, and integration of interdisciplinary approaches. Furthermore, the author placed the findings within the context of the rise of neuroethical issues and the research needs of the future.
REFERENCES
1. Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human kinetics.
2. Gaddes, W. H. (2013). Zearning disabilities and brain function: A neuropsychological approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
3. Jiang, X., & Nardelli, J. (2016). Cellular and molecular introduction to brain development. Neurobiology of disease, 92, 3-17.
4. LaFleur, K., Cassady, K., Doud, A., Shades, K., Rogin, E., & He, B. (2013). Quadcopter control in three-dimensional space using a noninvasive motor imagery-based brain- computer interface. Journal of neural engineering, 10(4), 046003.
5. Myers, D. G. (2011). Psychology in everyday life. Macmillan.
6. Yampolskiy, R. V. (2012). Leakproofing the singularity artificial intelligence confinement problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies JCS.
7. McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5, 115-133.
8. Ashby, W. (2013). Design for a brain: The origin of adaptive behaviour. Springer Science & Business Media.
9. Young, K. S. (1999). Internet addiction: Evaluation and treatment. Bmj, 319(Suppl S4).
10. Warwick, K. (2003). Cyborg morals, cyborg values, cyborg ethics. Ethics and information technology, 5(3), 131-137.
11. Choudhury, M. A., & Hossain, M. S. (2010). Neuro-cybernetics of socio-scientific systems. Mind & Society, 9, 59-83.
12. Fifer, M. S., Acharya, S., Benz, H. L., Mollazadeh, M., Crone, N E, & Thakor, N. V. (2012). Toward electrocorticographic control of a dexterous upper limb prosthesis: Building brain-machine interfaces. IEEE pulse, 3(1), 38-42.
13. Abraham, T. H. (2002). (Physio) logical circuits: The intellectual origins of the McCulloch-Pitts neural networks. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38(1), 3-25.
14. Zaras, A., Passalis, N., & Tefas, A. (2022). Neural networks and backpropagation. In Deep learning for robot perception and cognition (pp. 17-34). Academic Press.
15. Peters, B. (2010). From Cybernetics to Cyber Networks: Norbert Wiener, the Soviet Internet, and the Cold War Dawn of Information Universalism. Columbia University.
16. Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2023). On logical inference over brains, behaviour, and artificial neural networks. Computational Brain & Behavior, 6(2), 213-227.
17. Andersen, В. A., Aflalo, T., Bashford, L., Bjanes, D., & Kellis, S. (2022). Exploring cognition with brain-machine interfaces. Annual review of psychology, 73(1), 131-158.
18. Chen, H., Dong, G., & Li, K. (2023). Overview on brain function enhancement of Internet addicts through exercise intervention: Based on reward-execution-decision cycle. Frontiers in psychiatry, 14, 1094583.
19. Zhang, H., Jiao, L., Yang, S., Li, H., Jiang, X., Feng, J., & Wei, B. (2024). Brain-computer interfaces: the innovative key to unlocking neurological conditions. International Journal of Surgery, 110(9), 5745-5762.
20. Chen, J., Yu, K., Bi, Y., Ji, X., & Zhang, D. (2024). Strategic Integration: A Cross-Disciplinary Review of the fNIRS-EEG Dual-Modality Imaging System for Delivering Multimodal - Neuroimaging to Applications. Brain Sciences, 14(10), 1022.
21. Klutz, D. (2023). Neurofeedback for Cognitive Enhancement Intervention and Brain Plasticity. Journal of Biomedical and Sustainable Healthcare Applications, 3(1), 045-055.
22. Maurer, H. (2021). Cognitive science: Integrative synchronization mechanisms in cognitive neuroarchitectures of modern connectionism. CRC Press.
23. Bakhtiari, H. (2025). Harnessing Neuroplasticity: Evidence-Based Approaches to Behavioral Modification in Contemporary Society.
24. Gramouseni, F., Tzimourta, K. D., Angelidis, P., Giannakeas, N., & Tsipouras, M. G. (2023). Cognitive assessment based on electroencephalography analysis in virtual and augmented reality environments, using head mounted displays: a systematic review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(4), 163.
25. Tosti, B., Corrado, S., Mancone, S., Di Libero, T., Rodio, A., Andrade, A., & Diotaiuti, P. (2024). Integrated use of biofeedback and neurofeedback techniques in treating pathological conditions and improving performance: A narrative review. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1358481.
26. Kritika Er. (2025). A Neuroscience perspective on Al and Cybersecurity. ISACA Journal, vol.1, pp. 44-49
27. Kritika (2024). The Neural Frontier: Al's Relentless Encroachment into the Human Mind. International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication, 12(3), 7-14.
28. Kritika (2024). Neuro-driven Cybersecurity: Strengthening Digital Defence. Zondon Journal of Research in Computer Science and Technology, 24(1), 17-26.
29. Kritika E. (2025). Ethical Frontiers: Navigating the Intersection of Neurotechnology and Cybersecurity. J Exp Neurol, 6(1), pp. 21-25.
30. Kritika (2024). Leadership in Cyberspace: Delineating a secure course amidst rising threats. World Academic Journal of of Management, 12(3), 39-48.
© 2025. This work is published under http://www.ijana.in/index.php (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.