Abstract
EP3.3, e-Poster Terminal 3, September 4, 2025, 10:05 - 10:25
Aims
Population health surveys are crucial for monitoring health and informing policies. However, their capacity to address ethnic-racial inequities is constrained by conceptual and methodological challenges. This study examines the measurement and analysis?of?ethnic-racial inequities in Colombian health surveys (2002–2018).
Methods
This research combines document review and expert consensus to advance understanding in this field. It addresses four objectives using diverse methodologies. Objective 1. reviews how ethnic-racial analysis has been conducted in health surveys across diverse countries, employing a systematic methodological review grounded in critical race theory. Objective 2 analyses theoretical and methodological approaches to race, racism, and inequities in Colombian surveys (2002–2018). Objective 3 explores the potential for analysing inequities in these surveys through secondary data analysis, including the feasibility of a synthetic measure of ethnic-racial health inequity.
Results
Preliminary findings reveal that ethnicity is often operationalized superficially, limiting its utility for studying inequities. Colombian national health surveys commonly use census-based ethnic categorization, unchanged since 2010. While inequalities can be analysed, gaps remain in capturing meaningful information on lived experiences. Racism is largely overlooked, with analyses focusing on ethnic group comparisons rather than structural racism as a determinant. Several population groups lack sufficient data for quantitative analyses. Some surveys include qualitative studies that could enhance understanding of racism, but this information is not systematically collected. This omission limits insights into how ethnic-racial identities intersect with social determinants, leading to oversimplified or overlooked disparities.
Conclusions
Methodological limitations persist, hindering innovation. Without a shared understanding of ethnicity’s complexities, efforts to improve survey design and analysis remain insufficient.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia; School of Public Health, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
2 School of Public Health, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia





