Content area

Abstract

This work builds a benchmarking pipeline for resource deployment, configuration input, and the evaluation of Cassandra and ScyllaDB performance. It investigates performance under different scenarios, workload types, and internal structures. Insights and future improvements are provided. Analysing comparisons of both databases, there were several notable differences between Cassandra and ScyllaDB. ScyllaDB demonstrated superior performance in production-ready materialized views, global secondary indices, lightweight transactions, change data capture, row-based data cache, and adaptive behaviour to real-world workloads. On the other hand, Cassandra exhibited advantages, such as a well-established size-tiered compaction approach and the ability to leverage existing Java Virtual machine (JVM) tuning techniques.

Details

1009240
Title
Comparative Analysis of Pipeline Architecture, Resource Deployment, and Configuration for Cassandra API-Compatible Databases: ScyllaDB vs. Cassandra
Author
Tyshchenko Iryna 1 ; Rand, Kouatly 1 ; Khan, Talha Ali 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 1–3 University of Europe for Applied Sciences , Potsdam , Germany 
Publication title
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
174-186
Number of pages
14
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
De Gruyter Brill Sp. z o.o., Paradigm Publishing Services
Place of publication
Riga
Country of publication
Poland
Publication subject
ISSN
22558683
e-ISSN
22558691
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-12-12
Milestone dates
2025-04-15 (Received); 2025-11-21 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
12 Dec 2025
ProQuest document ID
3282092002
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/comparative-analysis-pipeline-architecture/docview/3282092002/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-12-13
Database
2 databases
  • ProQuest One Academic
  • ProQuest One Academic