Content area

Abstract

Background

Online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is a relatively new process, and it is recommended that institutions starting an online ART program conduct a risk analysis to identify potential hazards. While Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is common, Systems‐Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) has also been used to evaluate online ART workflows.

Purpose

An STPA hazard analysis was performed for a CT‐guided online ART system in a multi‐vendor environment. The goal was to identify potential risks and mitigations to guide the development of adaptive workflows and the quality management (QM) program.

Methods

The STPA hazard analysis was performed in four steps. First, process maps for online ART were generated to describe the interactions between users and systems. In the second step, the process maps were refined to a single control structure diagram model. In the third step, potential unsafe control actions (UCAs) were enumerated by the physicists involved in the analysis. Finally, mitigation strategies to address the UCAs were identified.

Results

A total of 496 UCAs were identified for 119 control actions, of which 239 (48.2%) were prioritized for mitigation due to having low or medium levels of detectability. The most frequent causal scenarios were accidental omission (20.1%), rushing (17.2%), and lack of training (15.9%). The most common consequences were delays (26.8%) and having to repeat work (13.5%). The two mitigation strategies considered to address the most causal scenarios were requiring trained adaptive staff (28.9%) and having physics oversight (19.9%).

Conclusions

The STPA led to valuable insights into the potential causes of unsafe control actions and various mitigation strategies that were used to develop the QM program. Notably, most UCAs were attributable to interactions between users and the system, rather than system failures. It is recommended that every institution starting an online ART program perform a risk assessment for their environment.

Details

1009240
Business indexing term
Company / organization
Identifier / keyword
Title
Systems‐theoretic process analysis of a CT‐guided online adaptive radiation therapy system in a multi‐vendor environment
Author
Foote, Colleen 1 ; McClatchy, David M 2 ; Yan, Susu 2 ; Olberg, Sven 2 ; Remillard, Kyla 1 ; Miles, Nathaniel 1 ; Pursley, Jennifer 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
 Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
Publication title
Volume
26
Issue
12
Number of pages
9
Publication year
2025
Publication date
Dec 1, 2025
Section
RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Place of publication
Malden Massachusetts
Country of publication
United States
e-ISSN
15269914
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-12-10
Milestone dates
2025-09-25 (manuscriptRevised); 2025-12-10 (publishedOnlineFinalForm); 2025-05-22 (manuscriptReceived); 2025-09-30 (manuscriptAccepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
10 Dec 2025
ProQuest document ID
3283066901
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/systems-theoretic-process-analysis-ct-guided/docview/3283066901/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-12-31
Database
ProQuest One Academic