Content area

Abstract

Background: The uterocervical angle (UCA) is a promising ultrasound parameter for predicting preterm birth. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is the gold standard for cervical assessment; however, some patients may decline the procedure due to discomfort or embarrassment. Although transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) offers an alternative associated with less discomfort, comparative data on UCA measurements between these two methods are limited. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the consistency and agreement between UCA measurements obtained using TVUS and TPUS in pregnant women between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, UCA and CL measurements of 189 pregnant women between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation were performed using TVUS and TPUS by a single specialist. Of these, 25 women (13.2%) were excluded due to inadequate TPUS image quality. A total of 164 women were included in the statistical analysis. Pearson correlation analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland–Altman analysis were performed. Results: UCA measurements showed a high positive correlation between TVUS and TPUS (r = 0.833, p < 0.001). The ICC was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.77–0.87), indicating good consistency, and the CCC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.86). The Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated a median difference of 3° between UCA measurements obtained via TVUS and TPUS. The non-parametric limits of agreement, represented by the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles, ranged from −20.9° to 34.8°. Conclusions: TPUS shows insufficient agreement to be used interchangeably with TVUS for UCA measurement. Although the level of consistency is high, inadequate image quality in a subset of cases and the uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of TPUS-derived measurements for predicting preterm birth limit its current clinical applicability.

Details

Title
Comparison of Transvaginal and Transperineal Ultrasonographic Uterocervical Angle Measurements in Low-Risk Pregnancies at 24–34 Weeks’ Gestation
Author
Dagdeviren Emrah 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kaya Yucel 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul 34480, Turkey 
 Division of Perinatology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul 34480, Turkey; [email protected] 
Publication title
Volume
15
Issue
24
First page
3232
Number of pages
12
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Basel
Country of publication
Switzerland
Publication subject
e-ISSN
20754418
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2025-12-17
Milestone dates
2025-10-16 (Received); 2025-12-16 (Accepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
17 Dec 2025
ProQuest document ID
3286271683
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/comparison-transvaginal-transperineal/docview/3286271683/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2025-12-24