Content area
To advance “bamboo-as-plastic-substitute” initiatives and the sustainable use of furniture materials, this study investigates flattened bamboo sheets by determining their principal-direction elastic constants and evaluating two common furniture T-joints—dowel-jointed panel-type and right-angle mortise-and-tenon frame-type—through tensile and bending load-bearing tests alongside finite element (FE) comparisons. The results show a pronounced anisotropy, with the longitudinal elastic modulus markedly higher than in other directions. At the joint level, the average ultimate load-bearing capacities were 4.06 kN (panel-type tension), 3.70 kN (frame-type tension), 0.264 kN (panel-type bending), and 0.589 kN (frame-type bending). Under identical structural configurations and boundary conditions, the tensile and bending capacities of flattened bamboo sheets were comparable to or exceeded those of the comparator materials (MDF, cherry wood, bamboo-based composites), and failures predominantly occurred in the adhesive layer rather than the bamboo substrate. Across four representative cases, FE predictions achieved a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 6.5% with a maximum relative error of 12.5%; the regression correlation was R2 ≈ 0.999 based on four paired observations, which should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. The study validates that FE models driven by experimentally measured anisotropic parameters can effectively reproduce the mechanical response of flattened bamboo T-joints, providing a basis for structural design, lightweighting, and parameter optimization in furniture applications. Further work should characterize adhesive systems, environmental durability, and interfacial failure mechanisms to enhance the model’s general applicability.
Details
Mechanical properties;
Finite element method;
Structural engineering;
Boundary conditions;
Anisotropy;
Flattening;
Optimization;
Bamboo;
Elastic properties;
Structural design;
Adhesives;
Load bearing elements;
Structural strength;
Elastic anisotropy;
Sustainable use;
Ultimate loads;
Furniture;
Substrates;
Failure mechanisms;
Modulus of elasticity;
Hardwoods;
Mechanical analysis;
Design optimization;
Bearing capacity;
Parameters;
Tee joints
; Liu Huanrong 3 1 Key Laboratory of Wood Material Science and Application, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] (C.W.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (Y.L.), Beijing Products Quality Supervision and Inspection Institute, Key Laboratory of Furniture Health and Intelligent Quality Safety, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 101300, China, Institute of Biomaterials for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan, Beijing 100102, China, Main Campus, Langfang Polytechnic Institute, Langfang 065000, China
2 Key Laboratory of Wood Material Science and Application, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] (C.W.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (Y.L.), Beijing Products Quality Supervision and Inspection Institute, Key Laboratory of Furniture Health and Intelligent Quality Safety, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 101300, China
3 Institute of Biomaterials for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan, Beijing 100102, China, Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration/Beijing for Bamboo & Rattan Science and Technology, Beijing 100102, China