It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
With the availability of monoclonal anti‐body treatment for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is a need to screen and identify emergent disease as soon as possible. In a companion abstract, a panel of six novel outcome measures from the digital Trail Making Test‐Part B (dTMT‐B) was able to dissociate patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) versus normal cognition (NC). The current research fashioned an abbreviated dTMT‐B test and assessed how well this test can dissociate patients with MCI versus NC; and relationships between paper/pencil neuropsychological tests.
Method
Using a digital neuropsychological battery of episodic and working memory tests, memory clinic patients (n = 58) were classified into groups presenting with MCI versus NC. An abbreviated dTMT‐B test was created by examining behavior confined to approximately the first half of the test, i.e., target circle ‘1’ through target circle ‘F’. The panel of dTMT‐B process metrics included (1) hit duration or time spent with the pen inside target circles; (2) distance or the length of an imaginary line connecting all targets; and (3) the velocity or the speed pen strokes were drawn.
Result
MCI patients were slightly older and less educated than NC patients; and scored lower on the MMSE. An ANOVA controlled for age, education, and sex found longer hit duration for MCI compared to NC patients (p < 0.004, η2 = 0.204). No differences were found for total distance or pen stroke velocity. Partial correlations controlled for age, education, and sex found that longer hit duration inside target circles was associated with lower performance on tests measuring attention (WAIS‐IV Digits Forward/ Trails A; r = ‐0.724, p < 0.001); working memory (WMS‐IV Symbol Span/ letter fluency; r = ‐0.520, p < 0.007); and episodic memory (CVLT‐9 Delay Free recall/ Recognition; r = ‐0.411, p < 0.037).
Conclusion
The engineering of the Trail Making Test‐ Part B onto the digital platform has resulted in a panel of new process‐based metrics and potentially increases the versatility of this test. An abbreviated version of the test could easily be deployed to screen for emergent cognitive impairment.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Celia Scott Weatherhead Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA,
2 Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Boston, MA, USA,
3 New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan University, Stratford, NJ, USA,
4 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,
5 Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA,
6 Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA,
7 Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA,, Rowan‐Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Stratford, NJ, USA,





