You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
Subtle behavioral changes may signal early cognitive decline, presenting opportunities for intervention. Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) is recognized as a precursor to cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The MBI‐Checklist (MBI‐C) has been validated as an effective tool for detecting MBI and assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms. However, its predictive value remains underexplored in Southeast Asian populations. Cultural factors may contribute to underreporting of emotional and behavioral symptoms, making objective assessment crucial. This study evaluates whether MBI‐C scores, assessed longitudinally, predict cognitive outcomes.
Method
The study included 571 participants (mean age:61.43±9.82years;44%male) from the Biomarkers and Cognition Study, Singapore (BIOCIS), assessed over two visits, one year apart. Participants were classified as cognitively normal, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, or mild dementia based on established criteria. Behavioral symptoms were measured using the self‐reported MBI‐C with a clinical cutoff of 5.5. Longitudinal cognitive outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models, incorporating MBI‐C total and subdomain scores at Visit 1 as predictors. Covariates included age, gender, education years, and APOEε4 status. A Visit×MBI‐C interaction term assessed temporal effects. Random intercepts captured individual variability.
Result
At Visit 1, participants with clinical MBI‐C scores demonstrated significantly poorer performance in global cognition (p = .035), verbal episodic memory (p = .020), verbal and associative episodic memory (p = .005 for immediate‐recall, p = .010 for delayed‐recall), visuospatial memory (p = .001 for immediate‐recall, p = .019 for delayed‐recall), and attention (p = .010). Higher MBI‐C total scores at Visit 1 significantly predicted worse cognitive diagnoses at Visit 2(β=0.163, p < .001). The Visit×MBI‐C interaction (β=0.163, p < .001) suggested an intensifying relationship between MBI‐C scores and cognitive outcomes over time. Subdomain analyses revealed significant associations between cognitive decline and MBI‐C domains, including Interest (β=0.266, p < .001), Mood (β=0.193, p = .001), Social (β=0.367, p = .012), Abnormal Beliefs (β=0.447, p = .015), and Impulse Control (β=0.196, p < .001).
Conclusion
Self‐reported MBI‐C scores predict early cognitive decline, reinforcing MBI symptoms as clinical markers. The strengthening association over time underscores their progressive impact on cognition. Notably, the Abnormal Beliefs subdomain showed the strongest association with cognitive deterioration, suggesting its utility as a marker for progression. Addressing MBI could mitigate cognitive decline, emphasizing its role in early intervention. Furthermore, the tendency in Southeast Asia to underreport behavioral symptoms may indicate that observed associations reflect more severe underlying pathology, reinforcing the robustness of these findings.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 nil, nil, nil, Nicaragua,
2 Dementia Research Centre (Singapore), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore,
3 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore,





