You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
The Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) is a behavioral tool designed to tax pattern separation, a critical hippocampal function involving the transformation of similar experiences into discrete, non‐overlapping memory representations. Our pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of MST administration among the oldest old, individuals 80 years and older, explore the association of MST performance metrics with established global cognitive measures, and evaluate potential age effects.
Methods
Thirty‐one participants aged 80 years and older from the UCI Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) and the 90+ Study underwent MST as part of their cognitive assessment. Participants categorized 64 images as “indoor” or “outdoor” during the encoding phase and later classified 96 images as “old,” “similar,” or “new” in a recognition phase. Images were categorized as targets (old), lures (similar), or foils (novel). Key outcome measures included recognition memory (REC) and the lure discrimination index (LDI). Linear regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the associations between MST scores, age, and cognitive measures, i.e. the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Results
Mean age was 92.7± 5.6 and 61.3% were female (Table 1). MST was successfully completed by all participants. Regression analyses revealed no significant association between MST scores and age (REC: p = 0.12; LDI: p = 0.09) (Table 2). A significant positive correlation was identified between MMSE and REC scores (β = 0.36, p = 0.02). No significant association was found between MMSE and LDI (β = 0.15, p = 0.28). Scatterplots indicated variability in individual MST scores with no discernible age‐related decline. (Figure 1)
Conclusion
The MST is a feasible and effective task for assessing pattern separation and recognition memory in the oldest old. The observed association between MMSE and REC, but not LDI, deserves further investigation. The direct relationship between REC and MMSE underscores the utility of MST as a cognitive assessment tool. Further research with expanded cognitive measures and imaging biomarkers is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving MST performance and its role as a digital biomarker for cognitive health.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA,
2 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA,





