Content area

Abstract

Measuring and mapping vegetation structure is essential for understanding the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems and for informing environmental policies. Recent years have seen a growing demand for high‐resolution data on vegetation structure, driving their prediction at fine resolutions (1–30 m) at state, continental, and global spatial extents by combining satellite data with machine learning. As these initiatives expand, it is crucial to actively discuss the quality and usability of these products. Here, we briefly summarize current efforts to map vegetation structure and show that continental‐to‐global canopy height models (CHMs) exhibit significant errors in canopy heights compared to national airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. We recommend that regions with abundant ALS data, such as Europe, prioritize using ALS‐based canopy height metrics rather than relying on less accurate predictions from satellite products. Despite variations in ALS data characteristics, such as temporal inconsistencies and differences in acquisition characteristics and classification accuracy, the generation of spatially contiguous canopy height products in raster format at fine spatial resolution is necessary and feasible. This requires coordinating efforts for data and survey harmonization, developing standardized processing pipelines and continent‐wide ALS products, and ensuring free access for research and environmental policy. We show that ALS data now cover most of Europe, with newer surveys achieving higher point densities, improving their suitability for vegetation mapping. Beyond numerous applications in forestry, ecology, and conservation, such data sets are crucial for calibrating future Earth Observation missions, making them essential for producing reliable and accurate global, fine‐resolution vegetation structure data.

Details

1009240
Location
Company / organization
Title
Spaceborne Canopy Height Products Should Be Complemented With Airborne Laser Scanning Data: Toward a European Canopy Height Model
Author
Moudrý, Vítězslav 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Remelgado, Ruben 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Forkel, Matthias 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Torresani, Michele 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Laurin, Gaia Vaglio 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Šárovcová, Eliška 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Garcia Millan, Virginia E. 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Fischer, Fabian Jörg 7   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Jucker, Tommaso 8   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gallay, Michal 9   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kacic, Patrick 10   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Hakkenberg, Christopher R. 11   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kokalj, Žiga 12   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Stereńczak, Krzysztof 13   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Erfanifard, Yousef 14   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Rocchini, Duccio 15   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Prošek, Jiří 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Roilo, Stephanie 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gdulová, Kateřina 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Cord, Anna F. 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Perrone, Michela 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Molina‐Valero, Juan Alberto 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Šmída, Jiří 16   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Surový, Peter 17   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Melichová, Zlatica 17 ; Malavasi, Marco 18   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Urban, Rudolf 19   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Štroner, Martin 19   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Seidel, Dominik 20   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Szabó, Szilárd 21   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Bertalan, László 21   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Eltner, Anette 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto 22   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kaňuk, Ján 23   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Barták, Vojtěch 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Franke, Daniel 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Brede, Benjamin 24   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Song, Qian 24   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Urbazaev, Mikhail 24   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kissling, W. Daniel 25   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Department of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic 
 Agro‐Ecological Modeling Group, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany 
 Faculty of Environmental Sciences, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Dresden, Germany 
 Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen/Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy, Competence Centre for Plant Health, Bolzano, Italy 
 Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems, National Research Council, Montelibretti Research Area, Montelibretti, Italy 
 Khaos Research, Institute of Software Technology and Engineering (ITIS), University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain 
 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany 
 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 
 Faculty of Science, Institute of Geography, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovakia 
10  Department of Remote Sensing, University of Würzburg, Institute of Geography and Geology, Würzburg, Germany 
11  Department of Geography, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA 
12  Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia 
13  Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Poland 
14  Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, College of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, IDEAS NCBR Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland 
15  Department of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic, BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 
16  Department of Geoinformatics and Didactics of Informatics, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic 
17  Faculty of forestry and wood science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic 
18  Department of Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy 
19  Department of Special Geodesy, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 
20  Department for Spatial Structures and Digitization of Forest, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany 
21  Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary 
22  BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 
23  Faculty of Science, Institute of Geography, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovakia, Photomap, s.r.o, Košice, Slovakia 
24  GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany 
25  Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 
Publication title
Volume
13
Issue
1
Number of pages
21
Publication year
2026
Publication date
Jan 1, 2026
Section
Data Article
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Place of publication
Hoboken
Country of publication
United States
Publication subject
e-ISSN
2333-5084
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
Document type
Journal Article
Publication history
 
 
Online publication date
2026-01-07
Milestone dates
2025-11-25 (manuscriptRevised); 2026-01-07 (publishedOnlineFinalForm); 2025-06-15 (manuscriptReceived); 2025-12-07 (manuscriptAccepted)
Publication history
 
 
   First posting date
07 Jan 2026
ProQuest document ID
3291081861
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/spaceborne-canopy-height-products-should-be/docview/3291081861/se-2?accountid=208611
Copyright
© 2026. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Last updated
2026-01-08
Database
ProQuest One Academic