Content area
Measuring and mapping vegetation structure is essential for understanding the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems and for informing environmental policies. Recent years have seen a growing demand for high‐resolution data on vegetation structure, driving their prediction at fine resolutions (1–30 m) at state, continental, and global spatial extents by combining satellite data with machine learning. As these initiatives expand, it is crucial to actively discuss the quality and usability of these products. Here, we briefly summarize current efforts to map vegetation structure and show that continental‐to‐global canopy height models (CHMs) exhibit significant errors in canopy heights compared to national airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. We recommend that regions with abundant ALS data, such as Europe, prioritize using ALS‐based canopy height metrics rather than relying on less accurate predictions from satellite products. Despite variations in ALS data characteristics, such as temporal inconsistencies and differences in acquisition characteristics and classification accuracy, the generation of spatially contiguous canopy height products in raster format at fine spatial resolution is necessary and feasible. This requires coordinating efforts for data and survey harmonization, developing standardized processing pipelines and continent‐wide ALS products, and ensuring free access for research and environmental policy. We show that ALS data now cover most of Europe, with newer surveys achieving higher point densities, improving their suitability for vegetation mapping. Beyond numerous applications in forestry, ecology, and conservation, such data sets are crucial for calibrating future Earth Observation missions, making them essential for producing reliable and accurate global, fine‐resolution vegetation structure data.
Details
; Remelgado, Ruben 2
; Forkel, Matthias 3
; Torresani, Michele 4
; Laurin, Gaia Vaglio 5
; Šárovcová, Eliška 1
; Garcia Millan, Virginia E. 6
; Fischer, Fabian Jörg 7
; Jucker, Tommaso 8
; Gallay, Michal 9
; Kacic, Patrick 10
; Hakkenberg, Christopher R. 11
; Kokalj, Žiga 12
; Stereńczak, Krzysztof 13
; Erfanifard, Yousef 14
; Rocchini, Duccio 15
; Prošek, Jiří 1
; Roilo, Stephanie 2
; Gdulová, Kateřina 1
; Cord, Anna F. 2
; Perrone, Michela 1
; Molina‐Valero, Juan Alberto 1
; Šmída, Jiří 16
; Surový, Peter 17
; Melichová, Zlatica 17 ; Malavasi, Marco 18
; Urban, Rudolf 19
; Štroner, Martin 19
; Seidel, Dominik 20
; Szabó, Szilárd 21
; Bertalan, László 21
; Eltner, Anette 3
; Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto 22
; Kaňuk, Ján 23
; Barták, Vojtěch 1
; Franke, Daniel 1
; Brede, Benjamin 24
; Song, Qian 24
; Urbazaev, Mikhail 24
; Kissling, W. Daniel 25
1 Department of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
2 Agro‐Ecological Modeling Group, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
3 Faculty of Environmental Sciences, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Dresden, Germany
4 Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen/Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy, Competence Centre for Plant Health, Bolzano, Italy
5 Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems, National Research Council, Montelibretti Research Area, Montelibretti, Italy
6 Khaos Research, Institute of Software Technology and Engineering (ITIS), University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain
7 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
8 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
9 Faculty of Science, Institute of Geography, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovakia
10 Department of Remote Sensing, University of Würzburg, Institute of Geography and Geology, Würzburg, Germany
11 Department of Geography, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
12 Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia
13 Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Poland
14 Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, College of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, IDEAS NCBR Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland
15 Department of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic, BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
16 Department of Geoinformatics and Didactics of Informatics, Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education, Technical University Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
17 Faculty of forestry and wood science, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
18 Department of Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
19 Department of Special Geodesy, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
20 Department for Spatial Structures and Digitization of Forest, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
21 Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
22 BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
23 Faculty of Science, Institute of Geography, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovakia, Photomap, s.r.o, Košice, Slovakia
24 GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
25 Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands