Content area

Abstract

Measures of fish abundance, assemblage composition and length were compared when sampled by baited remote underwater stereo-video (stereo BRUV) and diver-operated stereo-video transects (stereo DOV) at the Houtman Abrolhos Islands and Ningaloo Reef. Species richness counts were 40% higher on stereo BRUV than stereo DOV. Stereo BRUVs also recorded a greater number of large-bodied targeted species in higher abundance than stereo DOV (e.g. Lethrinus nebulosus, Plectropomus leopardus) at the Houtman Abrolhos and at Ningaloo Reef. Many non-targeted species were also recorded in greater abundances on stereo BRUV than stereo DOV (e.g. Coris auricularis, Gymnothorax spp). Stereo DOV transects recorded a greater abundance of some small-bodied Pomacentridae, Labridae and Scaridae species than did stereo BRUV, particularly at Ningaloo Reef. This study demonstrates that choice of sampling technique for surveys of reef fish can lead to very different biological interpretations of fish assemblage structure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Details

Title
Assessing reef fish assemblage structure: how do different stereo-video techniques compare?
Author
Watson, Dianne L; Harvey, Euan S; Fitzpatrick, Ben M; Langlois, Timothy J; Shedrawi, George
Pages
1237-1250
Section
ORIGINAL PAPER
Publication year
2010
Publication date
Jun 2010
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
00253162
e-ISSN
1432-1793
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
346998626
Copyright
Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Jun 2010