It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Seasonal forecasts, which look several months into the future, are currently underutilized in active decision-making, particularly for agricultural and natural resource management. This underutilization can be attributed to the absence of forecasts for decision-relevant variables at the required spatiotemporal resolution and at the time when the decisions are made and a perception of poor skill by decision-makers. Addressing these constraints, we quantified the skill of seasonal forecasts in informing two agricultural decisions with differing decision timeframes and influencer variables: (a) whether to apply fertilizer in fall or wait until spring based on expected winter temperatures, and (b) drought response, such as whether to lease water based on expectations of drought. We also looked into how early the forecast can be provided without significant degradation in skill. Currently, drought response decisions are typically formulated in April, utilizing drought forecasts issued in the same month, while fall fertilization decisions are generally made between August and September. There is growing interest among stakeholders in the availability of earlier forecasts to inform these critical choices. We utilized the North American multi-model ensemble (NMME) hindcasts for the time period 1982–2020 over the Pacific Northwest US (PNW) to obtain meteorological variables. Runoff was estimated via simulations of the coupled crop-hydrology VIC-CropSyst model. The skill assessment with the Heidke Skill Score (HSS) yielded promising outcomes in both decisions for the entire PNW region. Notably, NMME’s positive skill (median HSS of 30%) in predicting warmer winters identifies years when fertilizer application should be avoided to prevent fertilizer loss through mineralization (and associated costs). Similarly, there is skill in forecasting drought conditions in most irrigated watersheds for up to two months in advance of April, the current decision time. In conclusion, our findings affirm that contrary to the perception of low skill and resulting underutilization, current seasonal forecasts hold the potential to inform at least some key agricultural decisions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Hegewisch, Katherine 2
; Liu, Mingliang 1
; Abatzoglou, John T 2
; Adam, Jennifer C 1
; Nijssen, Bart 3
; Rajagopalan, Kirti 4
1 Washington State University, Civil and Environmental Engineering , Pullman, WA 99163-2618, United States of America
2 University of California Merced, Management of Complex Systems , Merced, CA 95343-5001, United States of America
3 University of Washington, Civil and Environmental Engineering , Seattle, WA 98195-2700, United States of America
4 Washington State University, Biological Systems Engineering , Pullman, WA 99163-2618, United States of America




