Content area
Full Text
Contents
- Abstract
- Attachment Theory and Research
- Early Attachment and Later Social Relations
- Study 1
- Method
- Subjects
- Materials and Procedure
- Results
- Factor Analysis
- Internal Consistency
- Norms
- Test–Retest Reliability
- Attachment Dimensions Versus Discrete Types
- Discussion
- Study 2
- Method
- Subjects
- Materials and Procedure
- Results
- Assigning Individuals to Attachment Styles
- Working Models of Self
- Working Models of the Social World
- Working Models of Love
- Relations Between Parenting Style and Working Models
- Sex Differences
- Discussion
- Study 3
- Method
- Subjects
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results
- Matching Between Partners on Attachment Style Dimensions
- Parent–Partner Matching
- Women
- Men
- Comparison of women and men
- Partner Attachment Style Dimensions and Subjects' Own Relationship Evaluation
- Women's evaluation of the relationship
- Men's evaluation of the relationship
- Subjects' Own Attachment Dimensions and Relationship Evaluation
- Women
- Men
- Discussion
- General Discussion
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Three studies were conducted to examine the correlates of adult attachment. In Study 1, an 18-item scale to measure adult attachment style dimensions was developed based on Hazan and Shaver's (1987) categorical measure. Factor analyses revealed three dimensions underlying this measure: the extent to which an individual is comfortable with closeness, feels he or she can depend on others, and is anxious or fearful about such things as being abandoned or unloved. Study 2 explored the relation between these attachment dimensions and working models of self and others. Attachment dimensions were found to be related to self-esteem, expressiveness, instrumentality, trust in others, beliefs about human nature, and styles of loving. Study 3 explored the role of attachment style dimensions in three aspects of ongoing dating relationships: partner matching on attachment dimensions; similarity between the attachment of one's partner and caregiving style of one's parents; and relationship quality, including communication, trust, and satisfaction. Evidence was obtained for partner matching and for similarity between one's partner and one's parents, particularly for one's opposite-sex parent. Dimensions of attachment style were strongly related to how each partner perceived the relationship, although the dimension of attachment that best predicted quality differed for men and women. For women, the extent to which their partner was comfortable...