Abstract
Electromagnetic (EM) imaging aims to produce large-scale, high-resolution soil conductivity maps that provide essential information for Earth subsurface exploration. To rigorously generate EM subsurface models, one must address both the forward problem and the inverse problem. From these subsurface resistivity maps, also referred to as volumes of resistivity distribution, it is possible to extract useful information (lithology, temperature, porosity, permeability, among others) to improve our knowledge about geo-resources on which modern society depends (e.g., energy, groundwater, and raw materials, among others). However, this ability to detect electrical resistivity contrasts also makes EM imaging techniques sensitive to metallic structures whose EM footprint often exceeds their diminutive stature compared to surrounding materials. Depending on target applications, this behavior can be advantageous or disadvantageous. In this work, we review EM modeling and inverse solutions in the presence of metallic structures, emphasizing how these structures affect EM data acquisition and interpretation. By addressing the challenges posed by metallic structures, our aim is to enhance the accuracy and reliability of subsurface EM characterization, ultimately leading to improved management of geo-resources and environmental monitoring. Here, we consider the latter through the lens of a triple helix approach: physics behind metallic structures in EM modeling and imaging, development of computational tools (conventional strategies and artificial intelligence schemes), and configurations and applications. The literature review shows that, despite recent scientific advancements, EM imaging techniques are still being developed, as are software-based data processing and interpretation tools. Such progress must address geological complexities and metallic casing measurements integrity in increasing detail setups. We hope this review will provide inspiration for researchers to study the fascinating EM problem, as well as establishing a robust technological ecosystem to those interested in studying EM fields affected by metallic artifacts.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Queralt, Pilar 2 ; Piñas-Varas, Perla 2 ; Ledo, Juanjo 3 ; Rojas, Otilio 4 1 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Department of Computer Architecture, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.6835.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 028X); Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.10097.3f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0387 1602)
2 Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Departament de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l’Oceà, Institut Geomodels, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5841.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0247)
3 Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Department of Physics of the Earth and Astrophysics, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667)
4 Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.10097.3f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0387 1602)





