Content area
Full Text
Contents
- Abstract
- Darwin's Concept of Sexual Selection
- Assortative Mating
- Importance of Mate Preferences for Sexual Selection and Assortment
- Study 1
- Method
- Subjects
- Procedure
- Confidential Biographical Questionnaire
- Marital Preferences Questionnaire
- California Psychological Inventory (CPI; Gough, 1957/1964 )
- Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ)
- Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS)
- Self- and spouse ratings
- Interpersonal Dependency Scales (IDS)
- EASI Temperament Scales (EASI)
- Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ)
- Public and Private Self-Consciousness
- General Vocabulary Test
- Interviewer Ratings
- Summary of procedures
- Results
- Most and Least Valued Characteristics in a Mate
- Sex Differences in Mate Selection Preferences
- Factor Analysis of Mate Preferences
- Composite Scores Based on Factor Analysis of Mate Preferences
- Personality and Background Correlates of Mate Preferences
- Spouse Correlations for Selection Preferences
- Relationships Between Mate Preferences and Obtained Spouses
- Study 2
- Method
- Subjects
- Procedure
- Results and Discussion
- General Discussion
- Consensual Preferences
- Individual Differences in Mate Preferences
- Sex Differences in Mate Preferences
- Hypothesis 1: Structural Powerlessness and Sex Role Socialization
- Hypothesis 2: Cues to Reproductive Investment
Figures and Tables
Abstract
In this article we examine preferences in mate choice within the broader context of the human mating system. Specifically, we discuss the consequences of mate preferences for the processes of assortative mating and sexual selection. In Study 1 (N = 184) we document (a) the mate characteristics that are consensually more and less desired, (b) the mate characteristics that show strong sex differences in their preferred value, (c) the degree to which married couples are correlated in selection preferences, and (d) the relations between expressed preferences and the personality and background characteristics of obtained spouses. In Study 2 (N = 100) we replicated the sex differences and consensual ordering of mate preferences found in Study 1, using a different methodology and a differently composed sample. Lastly, we present alternative hypotheses to account for the replicated sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and earning potential.
Neither men nor women prefer all members of the opposite sex equally. Some are favored over others, and one important research task is to identify the characteristics that prospective mates consider to be important. Although mate choice is clearly a crucial adult decision for more than 90% of the population (Price & Vandenberg, 1980