Content area
Full Text
Contents
- Abstract
- The Self: A Delicate Category
- Universal Aspects of the Self
- Divergent Aspects of the Self
- Two Construals of the Self: Independent and Interdependent
- The Independent Construal
- The Interdependent Construal
- Examples of the interdependent self
- Further definition of the interdependent self
- The role of the other in the interdependent self
- Consequences of an Independent or an Interdependent View of the Self
- Consequences for Cognition
- More interpersonal knowledge
- Context-specific knowledge of self and other
- Basic cognition in an interpersonal context
- Consequences for Emotion
- Ego-focused versus other-focused emotions
- Ego-focused emotions—emotions that foster and create independence
- Other-focused emotions—emotions that create and foster interdependence
- Consequences for Motivation
- More interdependent motives?
- The motive for cognitive consistency
- Common motives in an interdependent context
- The sef-related motives
- Self- or other-serving bias
- The nature of modesty
- Conclusions
- The Role of the Self
- Consequences for Self-Processes
- Consequences for Social Psychological Phenomena
- Construals of the Self and Gender
- Difficult Questions
Figures and Tables
Abstract
People in different cultures have strikingly different construals of the self, of others, and of the interdependence of the 2. These construals can influence, and in many cases determine, the very nature of individual experience, including cognition, emotion, and motivation. Many Asian cultures have distinct conceptions of individuality that insist on the fundamental relatedness of individuals to each other. The emphasis is on attending to others, fitting in, and harmonious interdependence with them. American culture neither assumes nor values such an overt connectedness among individuals. In contrast, individuals seek to maintain their independence from others by attending to the self and by discovering and expressing their unique inner attributes. As proposed herein, these construals are even more powerful than previously imagined. Theories of the self from both psychology and anthropology are integrated to define in detail the difference between a construal of the self as independent and a construal of the self as interdependent. Each of these divergent construals should have a set of specific consequences for cognition, emotion, and motivation; these consequences are proposed and relevant empirical literature is reviewed. Focusing on differences in self-construals enables apparently inconsistent empirical findings to be reconciled, and raises questions about what have...