Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- Social and Stereotype Structure as Obstacles to Achievement Identification
- Academic Identification
- Threats to Academic Identification
- Structural and cultural threats
- Stereotype threat
- Empirical Support for a Theory of Stereotype Threat and Disidentification
- Stereotype Threat and Intellectual Performance
- The stereotype threat of women performing math
- Stereotype threat versus genes
- Internal or situational threat
- The stereotype threat of African Americans on standardized tests
- The cognitive mediation of stereotype threat
- Self-rejection or self-presentation?
- Stereotype threat and domain identification
- Stereotype threat and the interpretation of group differences in standardized test performance
- Reaction of Disidentification
- Self-esteem's resilience to stigmatization
- A universal connection between stigmatization and poor school achievement
- The disassociation of self-esteem and school achievement
- “Wise” Schooling: Practice and Policy
- Existence Proof: A Wise Schooling Intervention
- Conclusion
Figures and Tables
Abstract
A general theory of domain identification is used to describe achievement barriers still faced by women in advanced quantitative areas and by African Americans in school. The theory assumes that sustained school success requires identification with school and its subdomains; that societal pressures on these groups (e.g., economic disadvantage, gender roles) can frustrate this identification; and that in school domains where these groups are negatively stereotyped, those who have become domain identified face the further barrier of stereotype threat, the threat that others’ judgments or their own actions will negatively stereotype them in the domain. Research shows that this threat dramatically depresses the standardized test performance of women and African Americans who are in the academic vanguard of their groups (offering a new interpretation of group differences in standardized test performance), that it causes disidentification with school, and that practices that reduce this threat can reduce these negative effects.
From an observer's standpoint, the situations of a boy and a girl in a math classroom or of a Black student and a White student in any classroom are essentially the same. The teacher is the same; the textbooks are the same; and in better classrooms, these students are treated the same. Is it possible, then, that they could still experience the classroom differently, so differently in fact as to significantly affect their performance and achievement there? This is the central question of this article,...





