Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- Biased Scanning and Internalization
- Self-Presentation and Social Reality
- Study 1: Publicness and Internalization
- Method
- Participants and Design
- The Cover Story and Overview
- Procedure
- The Debriefing
- Results
- Manipulation Check
- Main Analyses: Self-Ratings
- Supplemental Analyses: Affect Intensity Measure
- Ratings of Interview Responses
- Discussion
- Study 2: Internalization and Behavior
- Method
- Participants and Design
- Procedure
- Results
- Manipulation Check
- Self-Rating Measure
- Behavioral Measures
- Sitting distance
- Speaking to confederate
- Rating of Self-Portrayals
- Gender
- Discussion
- Study 3: Choice, Self-Reference, and Future Interaction
- Method
- Participants and Design
- Procedure
- Yoked versus self-referencing manipulation
- Future interaction manipulation
- High-choice versus low-choice manipulation
- Results
- Manipulation Check
- Main Analysis: Self-Ratings
- Discussion
- General Discussion
- Possible Causal Processes
- Temporary or Permanent Change?
- Conclusion
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Studies 1 and 2 showed that identical behaviors had greater impact on the self-concept when performed publicly rather than privately. That is, the self-concept is more likely to change by internalizing public behavior than by internalizing behavior that is identical but lacks the interpersonal context. The self-concept change extends even to behavioral changes and occurs even when participants are unaware of being observed. In addition, those who are high in self-monitoring are more likely to internalize their behavior than those who are low in self-monitoring. Study 3 provided evidence about what components of a public situation affect the internalization of behavior. Choice about making the self-portrayal, drawing on episodes from one's own past rather than relying on a yoked script, and expecting future interaction with the audience all increased the internalization of a public behavior.
How do people change their views about themselves? Psychological theory and evidence have provided ample evidence that self-concepts resist change and maintain stability (e.g., Maracek & Mettee, 1972; McFarlin & Blascovich, 1981; Sullivan, 1953; Swann, 1983, 1987; Swann & Ely, 1984; Swann & Hill, 1982; Swann & Predmore, 1985; Swann & Read, 1981). Yet occasionally people do change; indeed, such change is considered desirable in some settings, including psychotherapy and assertiveness training.
Research by social psychologists has recently produced one paradigm for studying and analyzing self-concept change. In this paradigm, people are induced to behave in a particular way, and their subsequent self-ratings show that they come...





